Back to Search Start Over

Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke

Authors :
Mair, Grant
von Kummer, Rüdiger
Adami, Alessandro
White, Philip M.
Adams, Matthew E.
Yan, Bernard
Demchuk, Andrew M.
Farrall, Andrew J.
Sellar, Robin J.
Sakka, Eleni
Palmer, Jeb
Perry, David
Lindley, Richard I.
Sandercock, Peter A.G.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Source :
Mair, G, von Kummer, R, Adami, A, White, P M, Adams, M E, Yan, B, Demchuk, A M, Farrall, A J, Sellar, R J, Sakka, E, Palmer, J, Perry, D, Lindley, R I & Sandercock, P A G & Wardlaw, J M 2017, ' Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke ', Stroke, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 353-360 . https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164, Stroke
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.<br />Background and Purpose— Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using randomized controlled trial data. Methods— We analyzed angiograms from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial of intravenous alteplase. Readers, masked to clinical, treatment, and outcome data, assessed prerandomization computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for presence, extent, location, and completeness of obstruction and collaterals. We compared angiography findings to 6-month functional outcome (Oxford Handicap Scale) and tested for interactions with alteplase, using ordinal regression in adjusted analyses. We also meta-analyzed all available angiography data from other randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytics. Results— In IST-3, 300 patients had prerandomization angiography (computed tomographic angiography=271 and magnetic resonance angiography=29). On multivariable analysis, more extensive angiographic obstruction and poor collaterals independently predicted poor outcome (P1 indicates benefit) in patients with (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.64; P=0.011) versus without (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.35; P=0.566) arterial obstruction (P for interaction 0.017). Conclusions— Intravenous thrombolytics provide benefit to stroke patients with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography evidence of arterial obstruction, but the sample was underpowered to demonstrate significant treatment benefit or harm among patients with apparently patent arteries. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Mair, G, von Kummer, R, Adami, A, White, P M, Adams, M E, Yan, B, Demchuk, A M, Farrall, A J, Sellar, R J, Sakka, E, Palmer, J, Perry, D, Lindley, R I & Sandercock, P A G & Wardlaw, J M 2017, ' Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke ', Stroke, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 353-360 . https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164, Stroke
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....fe37694ae094ebfc9e5f8f9daf01f9f1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164