Back to Search
Start Over
Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
- Source :
- Mair, G, von Kummer, R, Adami, A, White, P M, Adams, M E, Yan, B, Demchuk, A M, Farrall, A J, Sellar, R J, Sakka, E, Palmer, J, Perry, D, Lindley, R I & Sandercock, P A G & Wardlaw, J M 2017, ' Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke ', Stroke, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 353-360 . https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164, Stroke
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.<br />Background and Purpose— Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using randomized controlled trial data. Methods— We analyzed angiograms from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial of intravenous alteplase. Readers, masked to clinical, treatment, and outcome data, assessed prerandomization computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for presence, extent, location, and completeness of obstruction and collaterals. We compared angiography findings to 6-month functional outcome (Oxford Handicap Scale) and tested for interactions with alteplase, using ordinal regression in adjusted analyses. We also meta-analyzed all available angiography data from other randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytics. Results— In IST-3, 300 patients had prerandomization angiography (computed tomographic angiography=271 and magnetic resonance angiography=29). On multivariable analysis, more extensive angiographic obstruction and poor collaterals independently predicted poor outcome (P1 indicates benefit) in patients with (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.64; P=0.011) versus without (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.35; P=0.566) arterial obstruction (P for interaction 0.017). Conclusions— Intravenous thrombolytics provide benefit to stroke patients with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography evidence of arterial obstruction, but the sample was underpowered to demonstrate significant treatment benefit or harm among patients with apparently patent arteries. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518.
- Subjects :
- Male
Internationality
Original Contributions
Clinical Sciences
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Brain Ischemia
arteries
Fibrinolytic Agents
Humans
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Single-Blind Method
Thrombolytic Therapy
brain infarction
Prospective Studies
Aged
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Aged, 80 and over
stroke
meta-analysis
Treatment Outcome
Tissue Plasminogen Activator
ComputingMethodologies_DOCUMENTANDTEXTPROCESSING
cerebral angiography
Administration, Intravenous
Female
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Mair, G, von Kummer, R, Adami, A, White, P M, Adams, M E, Yan, B, Demchuk, A M, Farrall, A J, Sellar, R J, Sakka, E, Palmer, J, Perry, D, Lindley, R I & Sandercock, P A G & Wardlaw, J M 2017, ' Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke ', Stroke, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 353-360 . https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164, Stroke
- Accession number :
- edsair.pmid.dedup....fe37694ae094ebfc9e5f8f9daf01f9f1
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164