Back to Search Start Over

A precision measurement of the $p$($e,e^\prime p\,$)$\pi^0$ reaction at threshold

Authors :
Chirapatpimol, K.
Shabestari, M. H.
Lindgren, R. A.
Smith, L. C.
Annand, J. R. M.
Higinbotham, D. W.
Moffit, B.
Nelyubin, V.
Norum, B. E.
Allada, K.
Aniol, K.
Ardashev, K.
Armstrong, D. S.
Arndt, R. A.
Benmokhtar, F.
Bernstein, A. M.
Bertozzi, W.
Briscoe, W. J.
Bimbot, L.
Camsonne, A.
Chen, J. -P.
Choi, S.
Chudakov, E.
Cisbani, E.
Cusanno, F.
Dalton, M. M.
Dutta, C.
Egiyan, K.
Fernandez-Ramirez, C.
Feuerbach, R.
Fissum, K. G.
Frullani, S.
Garibaldi, F.
Gayou, O.
Gilman, R.
Gilad, S.
Goity, J.
Gomez, J.
Hahn, B.
Hamilton, D.
Hansen, J. -O.
Huang, J.
Igarashi, R.
Ireland, D.
de Jager, C. W.
Jin, X.
Jiang, X.
Jinasundera, T.
Kellie, J.
Keppel, C. E.
Kolb, N.
LeRose, J.
Liyanage, N.
Livingston, K.
McNulty, D.
Mercado, L.
Michaels, R.
Mihovilovic, M.
Qian, S.
Qian, X.
Mailyan, S.
Mamyan, V.
Marrone, S.
Monaghan, P.
Nanda, S.
Perdrisat, C. F.
Piasetzky, E.
Protopopescu, D.
Punjabi, V.
Qiang, Y.
Rachek, I. A.
Rakhman, A.
Ron, G.
Rosner, G.
Saha, A.
Sawatzky, B.
Shahinyan, A.
Sirca, S.
Sparveris, N.
Subedi, R. R.
Suleiman, R.
Strakovsky, I.
Sulkosky, V.
Moinelo, J.
Voskanyan, H.
Wang, K.
Wang, Y.
Watson, J.
Watts, D.
Wojtsekhowski, B.
Workman, R. L.
Yao, H.
Zhan, X.
Zhang, Y.
Source :
Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 192503 (2015)
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

New results are reported from a measurement of $\pi^0$ electroproduction near threshold using the $p(e,e^{\prime} p)\pi^0$ reaction. The experiment was designed to determine precisely the energy dependence of $s-$ and $p-$wave electromagnetic multipoles as a stringent test of the predictions of Chiral Perturbation Theory (ChPT). The data were taken with an electron beam energy of 1192 MeV using a two-spectrometer setup in Hall A at Jefferson Lab. For the first time, complete coverage of the $\phi^*_{\pi}$ and $\theta^*_{\pi}$ angles in the $p \pi^0$ center-of-mass was obtained for invariant energies above threshold from 0.5 MeV up to 15 MeV. The 4-momentum transfer $Q^2$ coverage ranges from 0.05 to 0.155 (GeV/c)$^2$ in fine steps. A simple phenomenological analysis of our data shows strong disagreement with $p-$wave predictions from ChPT for $Q^2>0.07$ (GeV/c)$^2$, while the $s-$wave predictions are in reasonable agreement.<br />Comment: 5 pages, 6 figures

Subjects

Subjects :
Nuclear Experiment

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 192503 (2015)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1501.05607
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.192503