Back to Search Start Over

SILVERRUSH. VI. A simulation of Ly$\alpha$ emitters in the reionization epoch and a comparison with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey early data

Authors :
Inoue, Akio K.
Hasegawa, Kenji
Ishiyama, Tomoaki
Yajima, Hidenobu
Shimizu, Ikkoh
Umemura, Masayuki
Konno, Akira
Harikane, Yuichi
Shibuya, Takatoshi
Ouchi, Masami
Shimasaku, Kazuhiro
Ono, Yoshiaki
Kusakabe, Haruka
Higuchi, Ryo
Lee, Chien-Hsiu
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The survey of Lyman $\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam, called SILVERRUSH (Ouchi et al.), is producing massive data of LAEs at $z\gtrsim6$. Here we present LAE simulations to compare the SILVERRUSH data. In 162$^3$ comoving Mpc$^3$ boxes, where numerical radiative transfer calculations of reionization were performed, LAEs have been modeled with physically motivated analytic recipes as a function of halo mass. We have examined $2^3$ models depending on the presence or absence of dispersion of halo Ly$\alpha$ emissivity, dispersion of the halo Ly$\alpha$ optical depth, $\tau_\alpha$, and halo mass dependence of $\tau_\alpha$. The unique free parameter in our model, a pivot value of $\tau_\alpha$, is calibrated so as to reproduce the $z=5.7$ Ly$\alpha$ luminosity function (LF). We compare our model predictions with Ly$\alpha$ LFs at $z=6.6$ and $7.3$, LAE angular auto-correlation functions (ACFs) at $z=5.7$ and $6.6$, and LAE fractions in Lyman break galaxies at $5<z<7$. The Ly$\alpha$ LFs and ACFs are reproduced by multiple models, but the LAE fraction turns out to be the most critical test. The dispersion of $\tau_\alpha$ and the halo mass dependence of $\tau_\alpha$ are essential to explain all observations reasonably. Therefore, a simple model of one-to-one correspondence between halo mass and Ly$\alpha$ luminosity with a constant Ly$\alpha$ escape fraction has been ruled out. Based on our best model, we present a formula to estimate the intergalactic neutral hydrogen fraction, $x_{\rm HI}$, from the observed Ly$\alpha$ luminosity density at $z\gtrsim6$. We finally obtain $x_{\rm HI}=0.5_{-0.3}^{+0.1}$ as a volume-average at $z=7.3$.<br />Comment: PASJ in press, 30 pages, 20 figures

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1801.00067
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psy048