Lithium Metal Penetration Induced by Electrodeposition through Solid Electrolytes: Example in Single-Crystal Li6La3ZrTaO12 Garnet

Solid electrolytes are considered a potentially enabling component in rechargeable batteries that use lithium metal as the negative electrode, and thereby can safely access higher energy density than available with today's lithium ion batteries. To do so, the solid electrolyte must be able to suppress morphological instabilities that lead to poor coulombic efficiency and, in the worst case, internal short circuits. In this work, lithium electrodeposition experiments were performed using single-crystal Li6La3ZrTaO12 garnet as solid electrolyte layers to investigate the factors that determine whether lithium penetration occurs through brittle inorganic solid electrolytes. In these single crystals, grain boundaries are excluded as possible paths for lithium metal propagation. However, Vickers microindentation was used to introduce sharp surface flaws of known size. Using operando optical microscopy, it was found that lithium metal penetration sometimes initiates at these controlled surface defects, and when multiple indents of varying size were present, propagates preferentially from the largest defect. However, a second class of flaws was found to be equally or more important. At the perimeter of surface current collectors, an enhanced electrodeposition current density causes lithium metal filled cracks to initiate and grow to penetration, even when the large Vickers defects are in close proximity. Modeling the electric field concentration for the experimental configurations, it was shown that a factor of 5 enhancement in field can readily occur within 10 micrometers of current collector discontinuities, which we interpret as the origin of electrochemomechanical stresses leading to failure. Such field amplification may determine the sites where supercritical surface defects dominate lithium metal propagation during electrodeposition, overriding the presence of larger defects elsewhere.
Comment: 32 pages