Back to Search Start Over

Shape Coexistence and Mixing of Low-Lying $0^+$ States in $^{96}$Sr

Authors :
Cruz, S.
Bender, P. C.
Krücken, R.
Wimmer, K.
Ames, F.
Andreoiu, C.
Austin, R. A. E.
Bancroft, C. S.
Braid, R.
Bruhn, T.
Catford, W. N.
Cheeseman, A.
Chester, A.
Cross, D. S.
Diget, C. Aa.
Drake, T.
Garnsworthy, A. B.
Hackman, G.
Kanungo, R.
Knapton, A.
Korten, W.
Kuhn, K.
Lassen, J.
Laxdal, R.
Marchetto, M.
Matta, A.
Miller, D.
Moukaddam, M.
Orr, N. A.
Sachmpazidi, N.
Sanetullaev, A.
Svensson, C. E.
Terpstra, N.
Unsworth, C.
Voss, P. J.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The low energy excited $0_{2,3}^+$ states in $^{96}$Sr are amongst the most prominent examples of shape coexistence across the nuclear landscape. In this work, the neutron $[2s_{1/2}]^2$ content of the $0_{1,2,3}^+$ states in $^{96}$Sr was determined by means of the d($^{95}$Sr,p) transfer reaction at the TRIUMF-ISAC2 facility using the SHARC and TIGRESS arrays. Spectroscopic factors of 0.19(3) and 0.22(3) were extracted for the $^{96}$Sr ground and 1229~keV $0^+$ states, respectively, by fitting the experimental angular distributions to DWBA reaction model calculations. A detailed analysis of the $\gamma$-decay of the isomeric $0_3^+$ state was used to determine a spectroscopic factor of 0.33(13). The experimental results are compared to shell model calculations, which predict negligible spectroscopic strength for the excited $0^+$ states in $^{96}$Sr. The strengths of the excited $0_{2,3}^+$ states were also analyzed within a two-level mixing model and are consistent with a mixing strength of $a^2$=0.40(14) and a difference in intrinsic deformations of $|\Delta \beta|=0.31(3)$. These results suggest coexistence of three different configurations in $^{96}$Sr and strong shape mixing of the two excited $0^+$ states.<br />Comment: Phys Lett B accepted

Subjects

Subjects :
Nuclear Experiment
Nuclear Theory

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1809.05899
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.031