Back to Search Start Over

Impact of polarization observables and $ B_c\to \tau \nu$ on new physics explanations of the $b\to c \tau \nu$ anomaly

Authors :
Blanke, Monika
Crivellin, Andreas
de Boer, Stefan
Kitahara, Teppei
Moscati, Marta
Nierste, Ulrich
Nišandžić, Ivan
Source :
Phys. Rev. D 99, 075006 (2019)
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The combined analysis of the BaBar, Belle, and LHCb data on $B\to D\tau\nu$, $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ and $B_c\to J/\Psi\tau\nu$ decay observables shows evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). In this article, we study all the one- and two-dimensional scenarios which can be generated by adding a single new particle to the SM. We put special emphasis on the model-discriminating power of $F_L(D^*)$ and of the $\tau$ polarizations, and especially on the constraint from the branching fraction ${\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)$. We critically review this constraint and do not support the aggressive limit of ${\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)<10\%$ used in some analyses. While the impact of $F_L(D^*)$ is currently still limited, the ${\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)$ constraint has a significant impact: depending on whether one uses a limit of $60\%$, $30\%$ or $10\%$, the pull for new physics (NP) in scalar operators changes drastically. More specifically, for a conservative $60\%$ limit a scenario with scalar operators gives the best fit to data, while for an aggressive $10\%$ limit this scenario is strongly disfavored and the best fit is obtained in a scenario in which only a left-handed vector operator is generated. We find a sum rule for the branching ratios of $B\to D\tau\nu$, $B\to D^*\tau\nu$ and $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\tau\nu$ which holds for any NP contribution to the Wilson coefficients. This sum rule entails an enhancement of ${\rm BR}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\tau\nu)$ over its SM prediction by $(24\pm 6)\%$ for the current $\mathcal{R}(D^{(*)})$ data.<br />Comment: 16 pages, 6 figures; v2: clarifying comments and few references added, matches version published in PRD; v3: typo corrected in eq. (28). Updated results based on the HFLAV average for spring 2019 are available in arXiv:1905.08253

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
Phys. Rev. D 99, 075006 (2019)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1811.09603
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.075006