Back to Search Start Over

Search for $\eta'$ bound nuclei in the $^{12}{\rm C}(\gamma,p)$ reaction with simultaneous detection of decay products

Authors :
Tomida, N.
Muramatsu, N.
Niiyama, M.
Ahn, J. K.
Chang, W. C.
Chen, J. Y.
Chu, M. L.
Daté, S.
Gogami, T.
Goto, H.
Hamano, H.
Hashimoto, T.
He, Q. H.
Hicks, K.
Hiraiwa, T.
Honda, Y.
Hotta, T.
Ikuno, H.
Inoue, Y.
Ishikawa, T.
Jaegle, I.
Jo, J. M.
Kasamatsu, Y.
Katsuragawa, H.
Kido, S.
Kon, Y.
Maruyama, T.
Masumoto, S.
Matsumura, Y.
Miyabe, M.
Mizutani, K.
Nagahiro, H.
Nakamura, T.
Nakano, T.
Nam, T.
Ngan, T. N. T.
Nozawa, Y.
Ohashi, Y.
Ohnishi, H.
Ohta, T.
Ozawa, K.
Rangacharyulu, C.
Ryu, S. Y.
Sada, Y.
Sasagawa, M.
Shibukawa, T.
Shimizu, H.
Shirai, R.
Shiraishi, K.
Strokovsky, E. A.
Sugaya, Y.
Sumihama, M.
Suzuki, S.
Tanaka, S.
Tokiyasu, A.
Tsuchikawa, Y.
Ueda, T.
Yamazaki, H.
Yamazaki, R.
Yanai, Y.
Yorita, T.
Yoshida, C.
Yosoi, M.
Source :
Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 202501 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

We measured missing mass spectrum of the $^{12}{\rm C}(\gamma,p)$ reaction for the first time in coincidence with potential decay products from $\eta'$ bound nuclei. We tagged an ($\eta+p$) pair associated with the $\eta'N\to\eta N$ process in a nucleus. After applying kinematical selections to reduce backgrounds, no signal events were observed in the bound-state region. An upper limit of the signal cross section in the opening angle $\cos\theta^{\eta p}_{lab}<-0.9$ was obtained to be 2.2 nb/sr at the 90$\%$ confidence level. It is compared with theoretical cross sections, whose normalization ambiguity is suppressed by measuring a quasifree $\eta'$ production rate. Our results indicate a small branching fraction of the $\eta'N\to\eta N$ process and/or a shallow $\eta'$-nucleus potential.<br />Comment: 7 pages, 4 figures

Subjects

Subjects :
Nuclear Experiment

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 202501 (2020)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2005.03449
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.202501