Back to Search Start Over

Revisiting the explodability of single massive star progenitors of stripped-envelope supernovae

Authors :
Zapartas, E.
Renzo, M.
Fragos, T.
Dotter, A.
Andrews, J. J.
Bavera, S. S.
Coughlin, S.
Misra, D.
Kovlakas, K.
Román-Garza, J.
Serra, J. G.
Qin, Y.
Rocha, K. A.
Tran, N. H.
Xing, Z. P.
Source :
A&A 656, L19 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Stripped-envelope supernovae (Types IIb, Ib, and Ic) that show little or no hydrogen comprise roughly one-third of the observed explosions of massive stars. Their origin and the evolution of their progenitors are not yet fully understood. Very massive single stars stripped by their own winds ($\gtrsim 25-30 M_{\odot}$ at solar metallicity) are considered viable progenitors of these events. However, recent 1D core-collapse simulations show that some massive stars may collapse directly into black holes after a failed explosion, with a weak or no visible transient. In this letter, we estimate the effect of direct collapse into a black hole on the rates of stripped-envelope supernovae that arise from single stars. For this, we compute single-star MESA models at solar metallicity and map their final state to their core-collapse outcome following prescriptions commonly used in population synthesis. According to our models, no single stars that have lost their entire hydrogen-rich envelope are able to explode, and only a fraction of progenitors left with a thin hydrogen envelope do (IIb progenitor candidates), unless we use a prescription that takes the effect of turbulence into account or invoke increased wind mass-loss rates. This result increases the existing tension between the single-star paradigm to explain most stripped-envelope supernovae and their observed rates and properties. At face value, our results point toward an even higher contribution of binary progenitors to stripped-envelope supernovae. Alternatively, they may suggest inconsistencies in the common practice of mapping different stellar models to core-collapse outcomes and/or higher overall mass loss in massive stars.<br />Comment: Published in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters; One main enhancement: added Couch et al. (2020) in the list of supernova engines

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
A&A 656, L19 (2021)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2106.05228
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141506