Back to Search Start Over

Thermal Phase Curves of XO-3b: an Eccentric Hot Jupiter at the Deuterium Burning Limit

Authors :
Dang, Lisa
Bell, Taylor J.
Cowan, Nicolas B.
Thorngren, Daniel
Kataria, Tiffany
Knutson, Heather A.
Lewis, Nikole K.
Stassun, Keivan G.
Fortney, Jonathan J.
Agol, Eric
Laughlin, Gregory P.
Burrows, Adam
Collins, Karen A.
Deming, Drake
Jovmir, Diana
Langton, Jonathan
Rastegar, Sara
Showman, Adam P.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

We report \textit{Spitzer} full-orbit phase observations of the eccentric hot Jupiter XO-3b at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m. Our new eclipse depth measurements of $1770 \pm 180$ ppm at 3.6 $\mu$m and $1610 \pm 70$ ppm at 4.5 $\mu$m show no evidence of the previously reported dayside temperature inversion. We also empirically derive the mass and radius of XO-3b and its host star using Gaia DR3's parallax measurement and find a planetary mass $M_p=11.79 \pm 0.98 ~M_{\rm{Jup}}$ and radius $R_p=1.295 \pm 0.066 ~R_{\rm{Jup}}$. We compare our \textit{Spitzer} observations with multiple atmospheric models to constrain the radiative and advective properties of XO-3b. While the decorrelated 4.5 $\mu$m observations are pristine, the 3.6 $\mu$m phase curve remains polluted with detector systematics due to larger amplitude intrapixel sensitivity variations in this channel. We focus our analysis on the more reliable 4.5 $\mu$m phase curve and fit an energy balance model with solid body rotation to estimate the zonal wind speed and the pressure of the bottom of the mixed layer. Our energy balance model fit suggests an eastward equatorial wind speed of $3.13 ^{+0.26} _{-0.83}$ km/s, an atmospheric mixed layer down to $2.40 ^{+0.92} _{-0.16}$ bar, and Bond albedo of $0.106 ^{+0.008} _{-0.106}$. We assume that the wind speed and mixed layer depth are constant throughout the orbit. We compare our observations with a 1D planet-averaged model predictions at apoapse and periapse and 3D general circulation model (GCM) predictions for XO-3b. We also investigate the inflated radius of XO-3b and find that it would require an unusually large amount of internal heating to explain the observed planetary radius.<br />Comment: 23 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication in AJ

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2111.03673
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac365f