Back to Search Start Over

A blind spot for large language models: Supradiegetic linguistic information

Authors :
Zimmerman, Julia Witte
Hudon, Denis
Cramer, Kathryn
Onge, Jonathan St.
Fudolig, Mikaela
Trujillo, Milo Z.
Danforth, Christopher M.
Dodds, Peter Sheridan
Source :
Plutonics, Volume 17, 2024, pages 107 - 156
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT reflect profound changes in the field of Artificial Intelligence, achieving a linguistic fluency that is impressively, even shockingly, human-like. The extent of their current and potential capabilities is an active area of investigation by no means limited to scientific researchers. It is common for people to frame the training data for LLMs as "text" or even "language". We examine the details of this framing using ideas from several areas, including linguistics, embodied cognition, cognitive science, mathematics, and history. We propose that considering what it is like to be an LLM like ChatGPT, as Nagel might have put it, can help us gain insight into its capabilities in general, and in particular, that its exposure to linguistic training data can be productively reframed as exposure to the diegetic information encoded in language, and its deficits can be reframed as ignorance of extradiegetic information, including supradiegetic linguistic information. Supradiegetic linguistic information consists of those arbitrary aspects of the physical form of language that are not derivable from the one-dimensional relations of context -- frequency, adjacency, proximity, co-occurrence -- that LLMs like ChatGPT have access to. Roughly speaking, the diegetic portion of a word can be thought of as its function, its meaning, as the information in a theoretical vector in a word embedding, while the supradiegetic portion of the word can be thought of as its form, like the shapes of its letters or the sounds of its syllables. We use these concepts to investigate why LLMs like ChatGPT have trouble handling palindromes, the visual characteristics of symbols, translating Sumerian cuneiform, and continuing integer sequences.<br />Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables. Accepted at IC2S2 2024. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2206.02608, arXiv:2303.12712, arXiv:2305.10601, arXiv:2305.06424, arXiv:1908.08530 by other authors

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
Plutonics, Volume 17, 2024, pages 107 - 156
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2306.06794
Document Type :
Working Paper