Back to Search Start Over

BASS XXXV. The $M_\rm{BH}$-$\sigma_\rm{\star}$ Relation of 105-Month Swift-BAT Type 1 AGNs

Authors :
Caglar, Turgay
Koss, Michael J.
Burtscher, Leonard
Trakhtenbrot, Benny
Erdim, M. Kiyami
Mejía-Restrepo, Julian E.
Ricci, Federica
Powell, Meredith C.
Ricci, Claudio
Mushotzky, Richard
Bauer, Franz E.
Ananna, Tonima T.
Bär, Rudolf E.
Brandl, Bernhard
Brinchmann, Jarle
Harrison, Fiona
Ichikawa, Kohei
Kakkad, Darshan
Oh, Kyuseok
Riffel, Rogério
Sartori, Lia F.
Smith, Krista L.
Stern, Daniel
Urry, C. Megan
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

We present two independent measurements of stellar velocity dispersions ( $\sigma_\rm{\star}$ ) from the Ca\,H+K \& Mg\,\textsc{i} region (3880--5550~\AA) and the Calcium Triplet region (CaT, 8350--8750~\AA) for 173 hard X-ray-selected Type 1 AGNs ($z \leq$ 0.08) from the 105-month Swift-BAT catalog. We construct one of the largest samples of local Type 1 AGNs that have both single-epoch (SE) 'virial' black hole mass ($M_\rm{BH}$) estimates and $\sigma_\rm{\star}$ measurements obtained from high spectral resolution data, allowing us to test the usage of such methods for SMBH studies. We find that the two independent $\sigma_\rm{\star}$ measurements are highly consistent with each other, with an average offset of only $0.002\pm0.001$ dex. Comparing $M_\rm{BH}$ estimates based on broad emission lines and stellar velocity dispersion measurements, we find that the former is systematically lower by $\approx$0.12 dex. Consequently, Eddington ratios estimated through broad-line $M_\rm{BH}$ determinations are similarly biased (but in the opposite way). We argue that the discrepancy is driven by extinction in the broad-line region (BLR). We also find an anti-correlation between the offset from the $M_\rm{BH}$ - $\sigma_\rm{\star}$ relation and the Eddington ratio. Our sample of Type 1 AGNs shows a shallower $M_\rm{BH}$ - $\sigma_\rm{\star}$ relation (with a power law exponent of $\approx$3.5) compared with that of inactive galaxies (with a power-law exponent of $\approx$4.5), confirming earlier results obtained from smaller samples.<br />Comment: Accepted by the ApJ

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2308.01800
Document Type :
Working Paper