Back to Search Start Over

The magnetic field in colliding filaments G202.3+2.5

Authors :
Gu, Qi-Lao
Liu, Tie
Li, Pak Shing
Shen, Zhi-Qiang
Liu, Xunchuan
Liu, Junhao
Lu, Xing
Montillaud, Julien
Jiao, Sihan
Juvela, Mika
Rawlings, Mark G.
Zhang, Qizhou
Koch, Patrick
Ristorcelli, Isabelle
Carriere, Jean-Sébastien
Eden, David
Ren, Zhiyuan
Tatematsu, Ken'ichi
Hirano, Naomi
Luo, Qiu-yi
Mai, Xiaofeng
Issac, Namitha
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

We observe the magnetic field morphology towards a nearby star-forming filamentary cloud, G202.3+2.5, by the JCMT/POL-2 850 {\mu}m thermal dust polarization observation with an angular resolution of 14.4" (~0.053 pc). The average magnetic field orientation is found to be perpendicular to the filaments while showing different behaviors in the four subregions, suggesting various effects from filaments' collision in these subregions. With the kinematics obtained by N2H+ observation by IRAM, we estimate the plane-of-sky (POS) magnetic field strength by two methods, the classical Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) method and the angular dispersion function (ADF) method, B_{pos,dcf} and B_{pos,adf} are ~90 {\mu}G and ~53 {\mu}G. We study the relative importance between the gravity (G), magnetic field (B) and turbulence (T) in the four subregions, find G > T > B, G >= T > B, G ~ T > B and T > G > B in the north tail, west trunk, south root and east wing, respectively. In addition, we investigate the projection effect on the DCF and ADF methods based on a similar simulation case and find the 3D magnetic field strength may be underestimated by a factor of ~3 if applying the widely-used statistical B_{pos}-to-B_{3D} factor when using DCF or ADF method, which may further underestimate/overestimate related parameters.<br />Comment: Accepted by ApJ. 20 pages, 9 figures

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2401.05079
Document Type :
Working Paper