The nonflow issue in connecting anisotropy measurements to hydrodynamics in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Hydrodynamics can describe majority of the measured azimuthal anisotropies in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Many of the anisotropy measurements are contaminated by nonflow correlations (i.e., those unrelated to global event-wise correlations). Those nonflow contamination can cause incorrectness or compromise the accuracy of the physics extracted from data-hydrodynamics comparison, particularly when one relies on subtle difference in the measurements. In the recent preprint by STAR (arXiv:2401.06625) extracting the Uranium nucleus deformation parameter, nonflow contamination is assessed by subevents in the limited STAR acceptance. In this note, we demonstrate that such assessment is inadequate and illustrate how large an effect nonflow can cause by using the HIJING model, in which all correlations are nonflow and non-hydrodynamic. We thereby conclude that the extracted Uranium deformation parameter is premature and emphasize the importance of an earnest assessment of or correction for nonflow contamination, not only for this STAR analysis but more generally for studies relying on comparing anisotropy measurements to hydrodynamic calculations.
Comment: 9 pages, 4 figs. This note points out a severe underestimation of nonflow in the recent STAR preprint (arXiv:2401.06625) and deems the extracted uranium deformation parameter premature. The note emphasizes, in general terms, the importance of rigorous nonflow estimation before comparing experimental anisotropy measurements to theoretical hydrodynamic calculations to extract quantitative physics