Back to Search Start Over

Searching for gravitational wave optical counterparts with the Zwicky Transient Facility: summary of O4a

Authors :
Ahumada, Tomás
Anand, Shreya
Coughlin, Michael W.
Gupta, Vaidehi
Kasliwal, Mansi M.
Karambelkar, Viraj R.
Stein, Robert D.
Waratkar, Gaurav
Swain, Vishwajeet
Laz, Theophile Jegou du
Anumarlapudi, Akash
Andreoni, Igor
Bulla, Mattia
Srinivasaragavan, Gokul P.
Toivonen, Andrew
Wold, Avery
Bellm, Eric C.
Cenko, S. Bradley
Kaplan, David L.
Sollerman, Jesper
Bhalerao, Varun
Perley, Daniel
Salgundi, Anirudh
Suresh, Aswin
Hinds, K-Ryan
Reusch, Simeon
Necker, Jannis
Cook, David O.
Pletskova, Natalya
Singer, Leo P.
Banerjee, Smaranika
Barna, Tyler
Copperwheat, Christopher M.
Healy, Brian
Kiendrebeogo, R. Weizmann
Kumar, Harsh
Kumar, Ravi
Pezzella, Marianna
Sagues-Carracedo, Ana
Sravan, Niharika
Bloom, Joshua S.
Chen, Tracy X.
Graham, Matthew
Helou, George
Laher, Russ R.
Mahabal, Ashish A.
Purdum, Josiah
Anupama, G. C.
Barway, Sudhanshu
Basu, Judhajeet
Raman, Dhananjay
Roychowdhury, Tamojeet
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

During the first half of the fourth observing run (O4a) of the International Gravitational Wave Network (IGWN), the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) conducted a systematic search for kilonova (KN) counterparts to binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star-black hole (NSBH) merger candidates. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the five high-significance (FAR < 1 per year) BNS and NSBH candidates in O4a. Our follow-up campaigns relied on both target-of-opportunity observations (ToO) and re-weighting of the nominal survey schedule to maximize coverage. We describe the toolkit we have been developing, Fritz, an instance of SkyPortal, instrumental in coordinating and managing our telescope scheduling, candidate vetting, and follow-up observations through a user-friendly interface. ZTF covered a total of 2841 deg$^2$ within the skymaps of the high-significance GW events, reaching a median depth of g~20.2 mag. We circulated 15 candidates, but found no viable KN counterpart to any of the GW events. Based on the ZTF non-detections of the high-significance events in O4a, we used a Bayesian approach, nimbus, to quantify the posterior probability of KN model parameters that are consistent with our non-detections. Our analysis favors KNe with initial absolute magnitude fainter than -16 mag. The joint posterior probability of a GW170817-like KN associated with all our O4a follow-ups was 64%. Additionally, we use a survey simulation software, simsurvey, to determine that our combined filtered efficiency to detect a GW170817-like KN is 36%, when considering the 5 confirmed astrophysical events in O3 (1 BNS and 4 NSBH), along with our O4a follow-ups. Following Kasliwal et al. (2020), we derived joint constraints on the underlying KN luminosity function based on our O3 and O4a follow-ups, determining that no more than 76% of KNe fading at 1 mag/day can peak at a magnitude brighter than -17.5 mag.<br />Comment: submitted

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2405.12403
Document Type :
Working Paper