Back to Search Start Over

Biomarkers of response to ocrelizumab in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Authors :
Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge
José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco
Noelia Villarrubia
Julia Gracia-Gil
Eva Fernández
Virginia Meca-Lallana
Carolina Díaz-Pérez
Susana Sainz de la Maza
Eva María Pacheco
Ana Quiroga
Lluis Ramió-Torrentà
Sergio Martínez-Yélamos
Laura Bau
Enric Monreal
Ana López-Real
Alexander Rodero-Romero
Laura Borrega
Santiago Díaz
Pablo Eguía
Mercedes Espiño
Juan Luis Chico-García
Francisco Javier Barrero
María Luisa Martínez-Ginés
José Manuel García-Domínguez
Soraya De la Fuente
Irene Moreno
Raquel Sainz-Amo
M. Alba Mañé-Martínez
Ana Caminero
Fernando Castellanos-Pinedo
Ana Gómez López
Andrés Labiano-Fontcuberta
Lucía Ayuso
Rossana Abreu
Miguel Ángel Hernández
José Meca-Lallana
Lorena Martín-Aguilar
Alfonso Muriel García
Jaime Masjuan
Lucienne Costa-Frossard
Luisa María Villar
Source :
Frontiers in Immunology, Vol 15 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo ascertain the changes of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) values in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with ocrelizumab and their association with treatment response.MethodsMulticenter prospective study including 115 RRMS patients initiating ocrelizumab treatment between February 2020 and March 2022 followed during a year. Serum samples were collected at baseline and every 3 months to measure sNfL and sGFAP levels using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology. Based on age and body mass index, sNfL values were standardized using z-score. NEDA (non-evidence of disease activity)-3 status was defined for patients free of disease activity after a year of follow-up. Inflammation (INFL) was considered when new relapses occurred during follow-up or new MRI lesions were found at 1-year exploration. PIRA (progression independent of relapse activity) was defined as disability progression occurring in the absence of relapses or new MRI activity.ResultsAfter a year on ocrelizumab, 85 patients (73.9%) achieved NEDA-3. Thirty patients did not achieve NEDA: 20 (17.4%) because of INFL and 10 (8.7%) because of PIRA. Of INFL patients, 6 (30.0%) had relapses, and 17 (85.0%) had at least one new MRI lesion at the 12-month examination. At baseline, INFL patients had higher sNfL (p = 0.0003) and sGFAP (p = 0.03) than the NEDA-3 group. PIRA patients mostly exhibited low sNfL and heterogeneous sGFAP levels. After a year, NEDA-3 and INFL patients showed similar decreases in sNfL (p < 0.0001) and sGFAP (p < 0.0001 for NEDA-3 and p = 0.001 for INFL ones). However, the decrease occurred earlier in NEDA-3 patients. Accordingly, sNfL > 1.5 z-score 3 months after ocrelizumab initiation indicated a higher risk of inflammation (OR = 13.6; p < 0.0001). Decrease in sGFAP values occurred later in both groups, with significant reductions observed at 12 months for INFL and 6 and 12 months for NEDA-3. No significant changes in sNfL or sGFAP were observed in PIRA patients.ConclusionOcrelizumab induced normalization of sNfL and sGFAP in the majority of NEDA-3 and inflammatory patients but did not cause changes in the PIRA group. Our data suggest that normalization of sNfL and sGFAP is associated with the lack of inflammatory-associated disease progression but it may not affect non-inflammatory PIRA.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16643224
Volume :
15
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.000198e5e11421c9eafc7ac50f33ed2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1480676