Back to Search
Start Over
Endovascular revascularization strategies using catheter-based thrombectomy versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia
- Source :
- Thrombosis Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Abstract Background Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is an important clinical event threatening both life and the affected limbs, but the optimal treatment for ALI remains undefined. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy approaches via either catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Methods A total of 98 patients (mean age 69.7 years, 60 male) who underwent endovascular intervention for ALI from January 2015 to July 2019 were included. Of these, 57 were treated with primary CBT via a large-bore catheter, an AngioJet catheter or Rotarex catheter, and/or underwent low-dose CDT, and 41 were treated with primary CDT. The safety and effectiveness of CBT compared to conventional CDT and other various endovascular techniques were evaluated. Results More Rutherford IIb patients were treated with primary CBT (68.4%) than CDT (26.8%; P .05). Clinical success was estimated to be achieved in 98.2% of patients who underwent CBT, which is similar to the 97.6% estimated in those who underwent primary CDT (P = 1.000), and this finding was similar among the CBT subgroups. Patients who underwent CBT had a higher procedure-related distal embolization rate and economic cost than those who underwent primary CDT (P
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14779560
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Thrombosis Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.02c8c79bda4d8cb1871be26f4fbd69
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-021-00349-9