Back to Search Start Over

The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment

Authors :
EFSA Scientific Committee
Diane Benford
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Michael John Jeger
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Simon More
Hanspeter Naegeli
Hubert Noteborn
Colin Ockleford
Antonia Ricci
Guido Rychen
Josef R Schlatter
Vittorio Silano
Roland Solecki
Dominique Turck
Maged Younes
Peter Craig
Andrew Hart
Natalie Von Goetz
Kostas Koutsoumanis
Alicja Mortensen
Bernadette Ossendorp
Andrea Germini
Laura Martino
Caroline Merten
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Anthony Smith
Anthony Hardy
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract To meet the general requirement for transparency in EFSA's work, all its scientific assessments must consider uncertainty. Assessments must say clearly and unambiguously what sources of uncertainty have been identified and what is their impact on the assessment conclusion. This applies to all EFSA's areas, all types of scientific assessment and all types of uncertainty affecting assessment. This current Opinion describes the principles and methods supporting a concise Guidance Document on Uncertainty in EFSA's Scientific Assessment, published separately. These documents do not prescribe specific methods for uncertainty analysis but rather provide a flexible framework within which different methods may be selected, according to the needs of each assessment. Assessors should systematically identify sources of uncertainty, checking each part of their assessment to minimise the risk of overlooking important uncertainties. Uncertainty may be expressed qualitatively or quantitatively. It is neither necessary nor possible to quantify separately every source of uncertainty affecting an assessment. However, assessors should express in quantitative terms the combined effect of as many as possible of identified sources of uncertainty. The guidance describes practical approaches. Uncertainty analysis should be conducted in a flexible, iterative manner, starting at a level appropriate to the assessment and refining the analysis as far as is needed or possible within the time available. The methods and results of the uncertainty analysis should be reported fully and transparently. Every EFSA Panel and Unit applied the draft Guidance to at least one assessment in their work area during a trial period of one year. Experience gained in this period resulted in improved guidance. The Scientific Committee considers that uncertainty analysis will be unconditional for EFSA Panels and staff and must be embedded into scientific assessment in all areas of EFSA's work.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.02e4e073f21147838607c8edf1a9a4b2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122