Back to Search Start Over

Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis

Authors :
James Stewart PhD
Arjun Sahgal MD
Aimee K M Chan MSc
Hany Soliman MD
Chia-Lin Tseng MD
Jay Detsky MD, PhD
Sten Myrehaug MD
Eshetu G Atenafu MSc
Ali Helmi MD
James Perry MD
Julia Keith MD
Mary Jane Lim-Fat MD, MSc
David G Munoz MD, MSc
Gelareh Zadeh MD, PhD
David B Shultz MD, PhD
Sunit Das MD, PhD
Catherine Coolens PhD
Paula Alcaide-Leon MD
Pejman Jabehdar Maralani MD
Source :
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, Vol 21 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
SAGE Publishing, 2022.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradiation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective matched cohort of 22 wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and 22 mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients were matched by sex, extent of resection, and corpus callosum involvement. The recurrent gross tumor volume was compared to the original gross tumor volume and clinical target volume contours from radiotherapy planning. Failure patterns were quantified by the incidence and volume of the recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, and positional differences of the recurrent gross tumor volume centroid from the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume. Results: The gross tumor volume was smaller for wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase patients compared to the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase cohort (mean ± SD: 46.5 ± 26.0 cm 3 vs 72.2 ± 45.4 cm 3 , P = .026). The recurrent gross tumor volume was 10.7 ± 26.9 cm 3 and 46.9 ± 55.0 cm 3 smaller than the gross tumor volume for the same groups ( P = .018). The recurrent gross tumor volume extended outside the gross tumor volume in 22 (100%) and 15 (68%) ( P = .009) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively; however, the volume of recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume was not significantly different (12.4 ± 16.1 cm 3 vs 8.4 ± 14.2 cm 3 , P = .443). The recurrent gross tumor volume centroid was within 5.7 mm of the closest gross tumor volume edge for 21 (95%) and 22 (100%) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively. Conclusion: The recurrent gross tumor volume extended beyond the gross tumor volume less often in mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients possibly implying a differential response to chemoradiotherapy and suggesting isocitrate dehydrogenase status might be used to personalize radiotherapy. The results require validation in prospective randomized trials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15330338
Volume :
21
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.03a16cab43984d47b7b72d8136a01005
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338221109650