Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations

Authors :
Tian Ge
Marguerite R. Irvin
Amit Patki
Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra
Yen-Feng Lin
Hemant K. Tiwari
Nicole D. Armstrong
Barbara Benoit
Chia-Yen Chen
Karmel W. Choi
James J. Cimino
Brittney H. Davis
Ozan Dikilitas
Bethany Etheridge
Yen-Chen Anne Feng
Vivian Gainer
Hailiang Huang
Gail P. Jarvik
Christopher Kachulis
Eimear E. Kenny
Atlas Khan
Krzysztof Kiryluk
Leah Kottyan
Iftikhar J. Kullo
Christoph Lange
Niall Lennon
Aaron Leong
Edyta Malolepsza
Ayme D. Miles
Shawn Murphy
Bahram Namjou
Renuka Narayan
Mark J. O’Connor
Jennifer A. Pacheco
Emma Perez
Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik
Elisabeth A. Rosenthal
Daniel Schaid
Maria Stamou
Miriam S. Udler
Wei-Qi Wei
Scott T. Weiss
Maggie C. Y. Ng
Jordan W. Smoller
Matthew S. Lebo
James B. Meigs
Nita A. Limdi
Elizabeth W. Karlson
Source :
Genome Medicine, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMC, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a worldwide scourge caused by both genetic and environmental risk factors that disproportionately afflicts communities of color. Leveraging existing large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS), polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown promise to complement established clinical risk factors and intervention paradigms, and improve early diagnosis and prevention of T2D. However, to date, T2D PRS have been most widely developed and validated in individuals of European descent. Comprehensive assessment of T2D PRS in non-European populations is critical for equitable deployment of PRS to clinical practice that benefits global populations. Methods We integrated T2D GWAS in European, African, and East Asian populations to construct a trans-ancestry T2D PRS using a newly developed Bayesian polygenic modeling method, and assessed the prediction accuracy of the PRS in the multi-ethnic Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) study (11,945 cases; 57,694 controls), four Black cohorts (5137 cases; 9657 controls), and the Taiwan Biobank (4570 cases; 84,996 controls). We additionally evaluated a post hoc ancestry adjustment method that can express the polygenic risk on the same scale across ancestrally diverse individuals and facilitate the clinical implementation of the PRS in prospective cohorts. Results The trans-ancestry PRS was significantly associated with T2D status across the ancestral groups examined. The top 2% of the PRS distribution can identify individuals with an approximately 2.5–4.5-fold of increase in T2D risk, which corresponds to the increased risk of T2D for first-degree relatives. The post hoc ancestry adjustment method eliminated major distributional differences in the PRS across ancestries without compromising its predictive performance. Conclusions By integrating T2D GWAS from multiple populations, we developed and validated a trans-ancestry PRS, and demonstrated its potential as a meaningful index of risk among diverse patients in clinical settings. Our efforts represent the first step towards the implementation of the T2D PRS into routine healthcare.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1756994X
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Genome Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.049f828882147afa27dd2a692f0bc18
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01074-2