Back to Search Start Over

The need for power, need for influence, sense of power, and directiveness in female and male superiors and subordinates

Authors :
Dagna Kocur
Eugenia Mandal
Source :
Current Issues in Personality Psychology, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 47-56 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Termedia Publishing House, 2017.

Abstract

Background The purpose of the study was to examine the phenomenon of power within an organisation from the vantage point of gender, the occupied position, earnings, and the number of subordinates. Participants and procedure The sample group comprised 107 female and 98 male participants. The mean age was 42.14 years (SD = 11.73). The study covered 100 superiors and 105 subordinates. The research tools were: the Need for Power and Influence Questionnaire (Bennett, 1988), the Personal Sense of Power Scale (Anderson, John, & Keltner, 2012), and the Directiveness Scale SD (Ray, 1976). Results The superiors scored significantly higher on the need for power, need for influence, and directiveness. They also scored higher in terms of the need for power in relations with other people, with colleagues, and in superior-subordinate relations. The number of male leaders was conspicuously greater than the number of female leaders. Furthermore, women had fewer subordinates than men and earned less than men. Female participants scored lower on the sense of power and the need for power scales. Conclusions Occupying either an executive or subordinate position differentiates between women and men in terms of sense of power in interpersonal relationships. The findings on sense of power in the professional context may be applied in organisational psychology in order to increase employees’ competence and qualifications.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23534192 and 2353561X
Volume :
6
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Current Issues in Personality Psychology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.051837974a2243118a7c600372f1f268
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.72200