Back to Search Start Over

Sex-disparities in chest pain workup: a retrospective cohort review of a university based clinical decision pathway

Authors :
Benjamin R. Titus
Karen S. Ream
Tehreem Rehman
Larry A. Allen
Source :
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Females have historically lower rates of cardiovascular testing when compared to males. Clinical decision pathways (CDP) that utilize standardized risk-stratification methods may balance this disparity. We sought to determine whether clinical decision pathways could minimize sex-based differences in the non-invasive workup of chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Moreover, we evaluated whether the HEART score would minimize sex-based differences in risk-stratification. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort review of adult ED encounters for chest pain where CDP was employed. Primary outcome was any occurrence of non-invasive imaging (coronary CTA, stress imaging), invasive testing, intervention (PCI or CABG), or death. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We stratified HEART scores and primary/secondary outcomes by sex. Results A total of 1078 charts met criteria for review. Mean age at presentation was 59 years. Females represented 47% of the population. Low, intermediate, and high-risk patients as determined by the HEART score were 17%, 65%, and 18% of the population, respectively, without any significant differences between males and females. Non-invasive testing was similar between males and females when stratified by risk. Males categorized as high risk underwent more coronary angiogram (33% vs. 16%, p = 0.01) and PCI (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.04) than high risk females, but this was not seen in patients categorized as low or intermediate risk. Males experienced more MACE than females (8% vs. 3%, p = 0.001). Conclusions We identified no sex-based differences in risk-stratification or non-invasive testing when the CDP was used. High risk males, however, underwent more coronary angiogram and PCI than high risk females, and consequently males experienced more overall MACE than females. This disparity may be explained by sex-based differences in the pathophysiology driving each patient’s presentation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712261 and 25073095
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.05c25073095a48d1949b03038002363b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03610-3