Back to Search Start Over

COVID-19: Factors associated with psychological distress, fear, and coping strategies among community members across 17 countries

Authors :
Muhammad Aziz Rahman
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam
Patraporn Tungpunkom
Farhana Sultana
Sheikh M. Alif
Biswajit Banik
Masudus Salehin
Bindu Joseph
Louisa Lam
Mimmie Claudine Watts
Sabria Jihan Khan
Sherief Ghozy
Sek Ying Chair
Wai Tong Chien
Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
Nashwa El-Khazragy
Ilias Mahmud
Adhra Hilal Al Mawali
Turkiya Saleh Al Maskari
Rayan Jafnan Alharbi
Amr Hamza
Mohamad Ali Keblawi
Majeda Hammoud
Asmaa M. Elaidy
Agus Dwi Susanto
Ahmed Suparno Bahar Moni
Alaa Ashraf AlQurashi
Almajdoub Ali
Amit Wazib
Cattaliya Siripattarakul Sanluang
Deena H. Elsori
Farhana Yasmin
Feni Fitrani Taufik
Manal Al Kloub
Mara Gerbabe Ruiz
Mohamed Elsayed
Nael Kamel Eltewacy
Nahed Al Laham
Natalia Oli
Ramy Abdelnaby
Rania Dweik
Ratree Thongyu
Sami Almustanyir
Shaila Rahman
Sirirat Nitayawan
Sondos Al-Madhoun
Suwit Inthong
Talal Ali Alharbi
Tamanna Bahar
Tribowo Tuahta Ginting
Wendy M. Cross
Source :
Globalization and Health, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMC, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Background The current pandemic of COVID-19 impacted the psychological wellbeing of populations globally. Objectives We aimed to examine the extent and identify factors associated with psychological distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study across 17 countries during Jun-2020 to Jan-2021. Levels of psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), fear of COVID-19 (Fear of COVID-19 Scale), and coping (Brief Resilient Coping Scale) were assessed. Results A total of 8,559 people participated; mean age (±SD) was 33(±13) years, 64% were females and 40% self-identified as frontline workers. More than two-thirds (69%) experienced moderate-to-very high levels of psychological distress, which was 46% in Thailand and 91% in Egypt. A quarter (24%) had high levels of fear of COVID-19, which was as low as 9% in Libya and as high as 38% in Bangladesh. More than half (57%) exhibited medium to high resilient coping; the lowest prevalence (3%) was reported in Australia and the highest (72%) in Syria. Being female (AOR 1.31 [95% CIs 1.09-1.57]), perceived distress due to change of employment status (1.56 [1.29-1.90]), comorbidity with mental health conditions (3.02 [1.20-7.60]) were associated with higher levels of psychological distress and fear. Doctors had higher psychological distress (1.43 [1.04-1.97]), but low levels of fear of COVID-19 (0.55 [0.41-0.76]); nurses had medium to high resilient coping (1.30 [1.03-1.65]). Conclusions The extent of psychological distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping varied by country; however, we identified few higher risk groups who were more vulnerable than others. There is an urgent need to prioritise health and well-being of those people through well-designed intervention that may need to be tailored to meet country specific requirements.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17448603
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Globalization and Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.05dd9206480e442b90cda3b412a8e145
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00768-3