Back to Search Start Over

Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis

Authors :
Eirini Karyotaki
Pim Cuijpers
Maritta Välimäki
Marianna Purgato
Kenneth Carswell
Ceren Acarturk
Teresa Au
Minna Anttila
Della Bailey
Rachel Churchill
Markus Koesters
Tella Lantta
Mariana Popa
Marit Sijbrandij
Federico Tedeschi
Ersin Uygun
Johannes Wancata
Corrado Barbui
Mark Van Ommeren
Wietse A Tol
Ross G White
Daniel Lakin
Emily Peckham
Jura Augustinavicius
Marx Ronald Leku
Sarah Al-Hashimi
Thomas Klein
Source :
BMJ Mental Health, Vol 26, Iss 1 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2023.

Abstract

Question Refugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to examine the effects and moderators of SH+ compared with Enhanced Care as Usual (ECAU) in reducing depressive symptoms among refugees and asylum seekers.Study selection and analysis Three randomised trials were identified with 1795 individual participant data (IPD). We performed an IPD meta-analysis to estimate the effects of SH+, primarily on depressive symptoms and second on post-traumatic stress, well-being, self-identified problems and functioning. Effects were also estimated at 5–6 months postrandomisation (midterm).Findings There was no evidence of a difference between SH+ and ECAU+ in reducing depressive symptoms at postintervention. However, SH+ had significantly larger effects among participants who were not employed (β=1.60, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.00) and had lower mental well-being levels (β=0.02, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.05). At midterm, SH+ was significantly more effective than ECAU in improving depressive symptoms (β=−1.13, 95% CI −1.99 to −0.26), self-identified problems (β=−1.56, 95% CI −2.54 to −0.59) and well-being (β=6.22, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.90).Conclusions Although SH+ did not differ significantly from ECAU in reducing symptoms of depression at postintervention, it did present benefits for particularly vulnerable participants (ie, unemployed and with lower mental well-being levels), and benefits were also evident at midterm follow-up. These results are promising for the use of SH+ in the management of depressive symptoms and improvement of well-being and self-identified problems among refugees and asylum seekers.

Subjects

Subjects :
Psychiatry
RC435-571

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
27559734
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Mental Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.073d4be5f24147e99a6ef8e38d4e56f4
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672