Back to Search Start Over

An exploratory study of adolescent response to fluoxetine using psychological and biological predictors

Authors :
Ada H. Zohar
Tamar Eilat
Maya Amitai
Michal Taler
Romi Bari
Alon Chen
Alan Apter
Avraham Weizman
Silvana Fennig
Source :
PeerJ, Vol 6, p e4240 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
PeerJ Inc., 2018.

Abstract

Background Not enough is known about predicting therapeutic response to serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, and specifically to fluoxetine. This exploratory study used psychological and biological markers for (retrospective) prediction of treatment-response to fluoxetine in depressed and/or anxious adolescents. Methods Forty-one consecutive adolescent outpatients with a primary diagnosis of severe affective and/or anxiety disorders were assessed and treated with an open-label 8-week trial of fluoxetine. Type D personality was assessed with the 14-item questionnaire, the DS14. In addition, TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1b were measured pre- and post-treatment. Results There was an elevation of Type D personality in patients, compared to the adolescent population rate. Post-treatment, 44% of patients were classified as non-responders; the relative risk of non-response for Type D personality patients was 2.8. Binary logistic regression predicting response vs. non-response showed a contribution of initial TNFα levels as well as Type D personality to non-response. Conclusions In this exploratory study, the most significant contributor to non-response was Type D personality. However, the measurement of Type D was not prospective, and thus may be confounded with psychiatric morbidity. The measurement of personality in psychiatric settings may contribute to the understanding of treatment response and have clinical utility.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21678359
Volume :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PeerJ
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.07818ce2dba84e0fa378c160332067d1
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4240