Accurate and efficient pulmonary CT imaging workflow for COVID-19 patients by the combination of intelligent guided robot and automatic positioning technology

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put radiologists at a higher risk of infection during the computer tomography (CT) examination for the patients. To help settling these problems, we adopted a remote-enabled and automated contactless imaging workflow for CT examination by the combination of intelligent guided robot and automatic positioning technology to reduce the potential exposure of radiologists to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection and to increase the examination efficiency, patient scanning accuracy and better image quality in chest CT imaging . Methods: From February 10 to April 12, 2020, adult COVID-19 patients underwent chest CT examinations on a CT scanner using the same scan protocol except with the conventional imaging workflow (CW group) or an automatic contactless imaging workflow (AW group) in Wuhan Leishenshan Hospital (China) were retrospectively and prospectively enrolled in this study. The total examination time in two groups was recorded and compared. The patient compliance of breath holding, positioning accuracy, image noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were assessed by three experienced radiologists and compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the CW group, the total positioning time of the AW group was reduced ((118.0 ± 20.0) s vs. (129.0 ± 29.0) s, P = 0.001), the proportion of scanning accuracy was higher (98% vs. 93%), and the lung length had a significant difference ((0.90±1.24) cm vs. (1.16±1.49) cm, P = 0.009). For the lesions located in the pulmonary centrilobular and subpleural regions, the image noise in the AW group was significantly lower than that in the CW group (centrilobular region: (140.4 ± 78.6) HU vs. (153.8 ± 72.7) HU, P = 0.028; subpleural region: (140.6 ± 80.8) HU vs. (159.4 ± 82.7) HU, P = 0.010). For the lesions located in the peripheral, centrilobular and subpleural regions, SNR was significantly higher in the AW group than in the CW group (centrilobular region: 6.6 ± 4.3 vs. 4.9 ± 3.7, P = 0.006; subpleural region: 6.4 ± 4.4 vs. 4.8 ± 4.0, P