Back to Search Start Over

2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation

Authors :
Michele Pisano
Luigi Zorcolo
Cecilia Merli
Stefania Cimbanassi
Elia Poiasina
Marco Ceresoli
Ferdinando Agresta
Niccolò Allievi
Giovanni Bellanova
Federico Coccolini
Claudio Coy
Paola Fugazzola
Carlos Augusto Martinez
Giulia Montori
Ciro Paolillo
Thiago Josè Penachim
Bruno Pereira
Tarcisio Reis
Angelo Restivo
Joao Rezende-Neto
Massimo Sartelli
Massimo Valentino
Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Itamar Ashkenazi
Miklosh Bala
Osvaldo Chiara
Nicola de’ Angelis
Simona Deidda
Belinda De Simone
Salomone Di Saverio
Elena Finotti
Inaba Kenji
Ernest Moore
Steven Wexner
Walter Biffl
Raul Coimbra
Angelo Guttadauro
Ari Leppäniemi
Ron Maier
Stefano Magnone
Alain Chicom Mefire
Andrew Peitzmann
Boris Sakakushev
Michael Sugrue
Pierluigi Viale
Dieter Weber
Jeffry Kashuk
Gustavo P. Fraga
Ioran Kluger
Fausto Catena
Luca Ansaloni
Source :
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-27 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMC, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract ᅟ Obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer represent challenging matters in terms of diagnosis, life-saving strategies, obstruction resolution and oncologic challenge. The aims of the current paper are to update the previous WSES guidelines for the management of large bowel perforation and obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) and to develop new guidelines on obstructive right colon carcinoma (ORCC). Methods The literature was extensively queried for focused publication until December 2017. Precise analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group formed by a pool of experts: the statements and literature review were presented, discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 4th Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held in Campinas in May 2017. Results CT scan is the best imaging technique to evaluate large bowel obstruction and perforation. For OLCC, self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), when available, offers interesting advantages as compared to emergency surgery; however, the positioning of SEMS for surgically treatable causes carries some long-term oncologic disadvantages, which are still under analysis. In the context of emergency surgery, resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) is preferable to Hartmann’s procedure, whenever the characteristics of the patient and the surgeon are permissive. Right-sided loop colostomy is preferable in rectal cancer, when preoperative therapies are predicted. With regards to the treatment of ORCC, right colectomy represents the procedure of choice; alternatives, such as internal bypass and loop ileostomy, are of limited value. Clinical scenarios in the case of perforation might be dramatic, especially in case of free faecal peritonitis. The importance of an appropriate balance between life-saving surgical procedures and respect of oncologic caveats must be stressed. In selected cases, a damage control approach may be required. Medical treatments including appropriate fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic treatment and management of co-existing medical conditions according to international guidelines must be delivered to all patients at presentation. Conclusions The current guidelines offer an extensive overview of available evidence and a qualitative consensus regarding management of large bowel obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17497922
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0957767f9b2d4d459557af9f784f4347
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3