Back to Search Start Over

Non‐random distribution of deleterious mutations in the DNA and protein‐binding domains of IRF6 are associated with Van Der Woude syndrome

Authors :
Azeez A. Alade
Carmen J. Buxo‐Martinez
Peter A. Mossey
Lord J.J. Gowans
Mekonen A. Eshete
Wasiu L. Adeyemo
Thirona Naicker
Waheed A. Awotoye
Chinyere Adeleke
Tamara Busch
Ada M. Toraño
Carolina A. Bello
Mairim Soto
Marilyn Soto
Ricardo Ledesma
Myrellis Marquez
Jose F. Cordero
Lydia M. Lopez‐Del Valle
Maria I. Salcedo
Natalio Debs
Mary Li
Aline Petrin
Joy Olotu
Colleen Aldous
James Olutayo
Modupe O. Ogunlewe
Fekir Abate
Taye Hailu
Ibrahim Muhammed
Paul Gravem
Milliard Deribew
Mulualem Gesses
Mohaned Hassan
John Pape
Oluwole A. Adeniyan
Solomon Obiri‐Yeboah
Fareed K.N. Arthur
Alexander A. Oti
Olubukola Olatosi
Sara E. Miller
Peter Donkor
Martine M. Dunnwald
Mary L. Marazita
Adebowale A. Adeyemo
Jeffrey C. Murray
Azeez Butali
Source :
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 8, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Background The development of the face occurs during the early days of intrauterine life by the formation of facial processes from the first Pharyngeal arch. Derangement in these well‐organized fusion events results in Orofacial clefts (OFC). Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) is one of the most common causes of syndromic cleft lip and/or palate accounting for 2% of all cases. Mutations in the IRF6 gene account for 70% of cases with the majority of these mutations located in the DNA‐binding (exon 3, 4) or protein‐binding domains (exon 7–9). The current study was designed to update the list of IRF6 variants reported for VWS by compiling all the published mutations from 2013 to date as well as including the previously unreported VWS cases from Africa and Puerto Rico. Methods We used PubMed with the search terms; "Van der Woude syndrome," “Popliteal pterygium syndrome,” "IRF6," and "Orofacial cleft" to identify eligible studies. We compiled the CADD score for all the mutations to determine the percentage of deleterious variants. Results Twenty‐one new mutations were identified from nine papers. The majority of these mutations were in exon 4. Mutations in exon 3 and 4 had CADD scores between 20 and 30 and mutations in exon 7–9 had CADD scores between 30 and 40. The presence of higher CADD scores in the protein‐binding domain (exon 7–9) further confirms the crucial role played by this domain in the function of IRF6. In the new cases, we identified five IRF6 mutations, three novel missense mutations (p.Phe36Tyr, p.Lys109Thr, and p.Gln438Leu), and two previously reported nonsense mutations (p.Ser424*and p.Arg250*). Conclusion Mutations in the protein and DNA‐binding domains of IRF6 ranked among the top 0.1% and 1% most deleterious genetic mutations, respectively. Overall, these findings expand the range of VWS mutations and are important for diagnostic and counseling purposes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23249269
Volume :
8
Issue :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0abb9e91af0b4d64a4c82a601537aef8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1355