Back to Search Start Over

Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial.

Authors :
Nav Persaud
Michael Bedard
Andrew Boozary
Richard H Glazier
Tara Gomes
Stephen W Hwang
Peter Juni
Michael R Law
Muhammad Mamdani
Braden Manns
Danielle Martin
Steven G Morgan
Paul Oh
Andrew D Pinto
Baiju R Shah
Frank Sullivan
Norman Umali
Kevin E Thorpe
Karen Tu
Andreas Laupacis
Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medications (CLEAN Meds) study team
Source :
PLoS Medicine, Vol 18, Iss 5, p e1003590 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.

Abstract

BackgroundAdherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted.Methods and findingsWe randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports.ConclusionsIn this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02744963.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15491277 and 15491676
Volume :
18
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0c06f422e334b1cbeb23e39a5a2962a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590