Back to Search Start Over

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability

Authors :
González Luis
Ayerbe Joaquín
del Real María
Álvarez Luis
Rueda Ma Trinidad
Brieva Pilar
Blanco Ricardo
Cañellas Montserrat
Vázquez Dolores
Milán Álvaro
Carballo Alejandro
Gimeno Nuria
Fernández Carmen
Fuster Salvador
Castillo Ma Dolores
Martí David
Calvo Eva
Ramírez Ma José
Gómez-Ochoa Ignacio
Corcoll Josep
Núñez Montserrat
Mufraggi Nicole
Gestoso Mario
Peña José
Martín José
Abraira Víctor
Muriel Alfonso
Giménez Sergio
Seco Jesús
Royuela Ana
Bagó Joan
Kovacs Francisco M
Ginel Leovigildo
Ortega Mariano
Bernal Miryam
Bolado Gonzalo
Vidal Anna
Ausín Ana
Ramón Domingo
Mir María
Tomás Miquel
Zamora Javier
Cano Alejandra
Source :
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 9, Iss 1, p 42 (2008)
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
BMC, 2008.

Abstract

Abstract Background The NDI, COM and NPQ are evaluation instruments for disability due to NP. There was no Spanish version of NDI or COM for which psychometric characteristics were known. The objectives of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire (NDI), and the Core Outcome Measure (COM), to validate its use in Spanish speaking patients with non-specific neck pain (NP), and to compare their psychometric characteristics with those of the Spanish version of the Northwick Pain Questionnaire (NPQ). Methods Translation/re-translation of the English versions of the NDI and the COM was done blindly and independently by a multidisciplinary team. The study was done in 9 primary care Centers and 12 specialty services from 9 regions in Spain, with 221 acute, subacute and chronic patients who visited their physician for NP: 54 in the pilot phase and 167 in the validation phase. Neck pain (VAS), referred pain (VAS), disability (NDI, COM and NPQ), catastrophizing (CSQ) and quality of life (SF-12) were measured on their first visit and 14 days later. Patients' self-assessment was used as the external criterion for pain and disability. In the pilot phase, patients' understanding of each item in the NDI and COM was assessed, and on day 1 test-retest reliability was estimated by giving a second NDI and COM in which the name of the questionnaires and the order of the items had been changed. Results Comprehensibility of NDI and COM were good. Minutes needed to fill out the questionnaires [median, (P25, P75)]: NDI. 4 (2.2, 10.0), COM: 2.1 (1.0, 4.9). Reliability: [ICC, (95%CI)]: NDI: 0.88 (0.80, 0.93). COM: 0.85 (0.75,0.91). Sensitivity to change: Effect size for patients having worsened, not changed and improved between days 1 and 15, according to the external criterion for disability: NDI: -0.24, 0.15, 0.66; NPQ: -0.14, 0.06, 0.67; COM: 0.05, 0.19, 0.92. Validity: Results of NDI, NPQ and COM were consistent with the external criterion for disability, whereas only those from NDI were consistent with the one for pain. Correlations with VAS, CSQ and SF-12 were similar for NDI and NPQ (absolute values between 0.36 and 0.50 on day 1, between 0.38 and 0.70 on day 15), and slightly lower for COM (between 0.36 and 0.48 on day 1, and between 0.33 and 0.61 on day 15). Correlation between NDI and NPQ: r = 0.84 on day 1, r = 0.91 on day 15. Correlation between COM and NPQ: r = 0.63 on day 1, r = 0.71 on day 15. Conclusion Although most psychometric characteristics of NDI, NPQ and COM are similar, those from the latter one are worse and its use may lead to patients' evolution seeming more positive than it actually is. NDI seems to be the best instrument for measuring NP-related disability, since its results are the most consistent with patient's assessment of their own clinical status and evolution. It takes two more minutes to answer the NDI than to answer the COM, but it can be reliably filled out by the patient without assistance. Trial Registration Clinical Trials Register NCT00349544.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712474
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1058f3e344264d20b0e62619552d1788
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-42