Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG)

MLA

Chen H, et al. “Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG).” International Journal of General Medicine, vol. ume 14, Dec. 2021, pp. 9193–202. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.1241ac7234ea40adb6c8115101b762de&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Chen H, Han M, Jing H, Liu Z, Shang H, Wang Q, & Cheng W. (2021). Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG). International Journal of General Medicine, ume 14, 9193–9202.

Chicago

Chen H, Han M, Jing H, Liu Z, Shang H, Wang Q, and Cheng W. 2021. “Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG).” International Journal of General Medicine ume 14 (December): 9193–9202. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.1241ac7234ea40adb6c8115101b762de&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.