Back to Search Start Over

Zootherapy as a potential pathway for zoonotic spillover: a mixed-methods study of the use of animal products in medicinal and cultural practices in Nigeria

Authors :
Sagan Friant
Jesse Bonwitt
Wilfred A. Ayambem
Nzube M. Ifebueme
Alobi O. Alobi
Oshama M. Otukpa
Andrew J. Bennett
Corrigan Shea
Jessica M. Rothman
Tony L. Goldberg
Jerry K. Jacka
Source :
One Health Outlook, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-21 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMC, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding how and why people interact with animals is important for the prevention and control of zoonoses. To date, studies have primarily focused on the most visible forms of human-animal contact (e.g., hunting and consumption), thereby blinding One Health researchers and practitioners to the broader range of human-animal interactions that can serve as cryptic sources of zoonotic diseases. Zootherapy, the use of animal products for traditional medicine and cultural practices, is widespread and can generate opportunities for human exposure to zoonoses. Existing research examining zootherapies omits details necessary to adequately assess potential zoonotic risks. Methods We used a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data from questionnaires, key informant interviews, and field notes to examine the use of zootherapy in nine villages engaged in wildlife hunting, consumption, and trade in Cross River State, Nigeria. We analyzed medicinal and cultural practices involving animals from a zoonotic disease perspective, by including details of animal use that may generate pathways for zoonotic transmission. We also examined the sociodemographic, cultural, and environmental contexts of zootherapeutic practices that can further shape the nature and frequency of human-animal interactions. Results Within our study population, people reported using 44 different animal species for zootherapeutic practices, including taxonomic groups considered to be “high risk” for zoonoses and threatened with extinction. Variation in use of animal parts, preparation norms, and administration practices generated a highly diverse set of zootherapeutic practices (n = 292) and potential zoonotic exposure risks. Use of zootherapy was patterned by demographic and environmental contexts, with zootherapy more commonly practiced by hunting households (OR = 2.47, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25244655
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
One Health Outlook
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.13b164f1570e4084a3e999f72f30e4ae
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-022-00060-3