Back to Search
Start Over
Exploring (Anti-)Radicalism on TikTok: German Islamic Content Creators between Advocacy and Activism
- Source :
- Religions, Vol 15, Iss 10, p 1172 (2024)
- Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- MDPI AG, 2024.
-
Abstract
- This study explores the representation of radical and anti-radical ideologies among German Islamic TikTok creators, analyzing 2983 videos from 43 accounts through qualitative content analysis. The results reveal two main content clusters: religious practice involving social/lifestyle issues and political activism around Muslim grievances. Victimization, found in 150 videos, was the most common indicator associated with radicalization and emerged as a source of political activism and subversive discourse. Overall, indicators of radicalism were scarce, suggesting that visible mainstream Islamic creators do not exhibit high levels of radical ideology. However, this also reflects a selection bias in the design of this study, which systematically overlooks fringe actors. In addition, religious advocacy was the most common topic (1144 videos), serving as a source of guidance and motivation, but was occasionally linked to sectarianism and rigid religious interpretations. Male creators posted more religious/theological videos; female creators posted more lifestyle videos. However, gender distinctions are limited due to the low representation of female creators (6). Some topics, such as the hijab, served as an intersection between religious practice and politicized narratives. This study highlights TikTok’s role in promoting diverse ideological views and shaping community engagement, knowledge sharing, and political mobilization within Germany’s Muslim digital landscape.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20771444
- Volume :
- 15
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Religions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.1be81c199d214c00954193d17da82057
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101172