Back to Search Start Over

Rapid Adoption of Telemedicine in Rheumatology Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Highlights Training and Supervision Concerns Among Rheumatology Trainees

Authors :
Su‐Ann Yeoh
Kristen Young
Michael Putman
Sebastian Sattui
Richard Conway
Elizabeth Graef
Adam Kilian
Maximilian Konig
Jeffrey Sparks
Manuel Ugarte‐Gil
Laura Upton
Francis Berenbaum
Suleman Bhana
Wendy Costello
Jonathan Hausmann
Pedro Machado
Philip Robinson
Emily Sirotich
Paul Sufka
Jinoos Yazdany
Jean Liew
Rebecca Grainger
Zachary Wallace
Arundathi Jayatilleke
The Global Rheumatology Alliance
Source :
ACR Open Rheumatology, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 128-133 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of telemedicine use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on rheumatology trainees. Methods A voluntary, anonymous, web‐based survey was administered in English, Spanish, or French from August 19 to October 5, 2020. Adult and pediatric rheumatology trainees were invited to participate via social media and email. Using multiple‐choice questions and Likert scales, the survey assessed prior and current telemedicine use, impact on training, and supervision after COVID‐19 prompted rapid telemedicine implementation. Results Surveys were received from 302 trainees from 33 countries, with 83% in adult rheumatology training programs. Reported telemedicine use increased from 13% before the pandemic to 82% during the pandemic. United States trainees predominantly used video visits, whereas outside the United States telemedicine was predominantly audio only. Most (65%) evaluated new patients using telemedicine. More respondents were comfortable using telemedicine for follow‐up patients (69%) than for new patients (25%). Only 39% of respondents reported receiving telemedicine‐focused training, including instruction on software, clinical skills, and billing, whereas more than half of United States trainees (59%) had training. Postconsultation verbal discussion was the most frequent form of supervision; 24% reported no supervision. Trainees found that telemedicine negatively impacted supervision (50%) and the quality of clinical teaching received (70%), with only 9% reporting a positive impact. Conclusions Despite widespread uptake of telemedicine, a low proportion of trainees received telemedicine training, and many lacked comfort in evaluating patients, particularly new patients. Inadequate supervision and clinical teaching were areas of concern. If telemedicine remains in widespread use, ensuring appropriate trainee supervision and teaching should be prioritized.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25785745
Volume :
4
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
ACR Open Rheumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1c79cbca674444e9f5cc724f0346bb9
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11355