Back to Search Start Over

Targeting Refractory Sarcomas and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in a Phase I/II Study of Sirolimus in Combination with Ganetespib (SARC023)

Authors :
AeRang Kim
Yao Lu
Scott H. Okuno
Denise Reinke
Ophélia Maertens
John Perentesis
Mitali Basu
Pamela L. Wolters
Thomas De Raedt
Sant Chawla
Rashmi Chugh
Brian A. Van Tine
Geraldine O’Sullivan
Alice Chen
Karen Cichowski
Brigitte C. Widemann
Source :
Sarcoma, Vol 2020 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Combining Hsp90 inhibitors to enhance endoplasmic reticulum stress with mTOR inhibition results in dramatic MPNST shrinkage in a genetically engineered MPNST mouse model. Ganetespib is an injectable potent small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90. Sirolimus is an oral mTOR inhibitor. We sought to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose of ganetespib and sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcomas and assess clinical benefits in patients with unresectable/refractory MPNSTs. Patients and Methods. In this multi-institutional, open-label, phase 1/2 study of ganetespib and sirolimus, patients ≥16 years with histologically confirmed refractory sarcoma (phase 1) or MPNST (phase 2) were eligible. A conventional 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used for phase 1. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures were evaluated. Primary objectives of phase 2 were to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of this combination in MPNSTs. Patient-reported outcomes assessed pain. Results. Twenty patients were enrolled (10 per phase). Toxicities were manageable; most frequent non-DLTs were diarrhea, elevated liver transaminases, and fatigue. The recommended dose of ganetespib was 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 with sirolimus 4 mg orally once daily with day 1 loading dose of 12 mg. In phase 1, one patient with leiomyosarcoma achieved a sustained partial response. In phase 2, no responses were observed. The median number of cycles treated was 2 (1–4). Patients did not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined per protocol. Pain ratings decreased or were stable. Conclusion. Despite promising preclinical rationale and tolerability of the combination therapy, no responses were observed, and the study did not meet parameters for further evaluation in MPNSTs. This trial was registered with (NCT02008877).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1357714X and 13691643
Volume :
2020
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Sarcoma
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1f1a358664ee478b94751c3fec57799c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5784876