Robotic-assisted uretero-ileal reimplantation for benign ureteral strictures in patients with prior minimally-invasive radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion

Objective: To present the surgical technique and outcomes of robotic ureteral reimplantation in ileal conduit (IC) and neobladder (NB) in patients with prior minimally-invasive radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion, who developed benign uretero-ileal anastomotic strictures. Patients and surgical procedure: We report on a multiinstitutional cohort of 10 patients (7 IC, 3 NB) who had 12 uretero-ileal strictures (8 unilateral, 2 bilateral) causing hydronephrosis and renal function deterioration, who underwent robotic uretero-ileal reimplantation in referral centers for robotic surgery between 2016 and 2022. Median age was 67.5 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 66–69). The stricture was diagnosed at a median of 6 months (IQR 5–10) from the initial surgery. All unilateral strictures were on the left side. Two patients received unsuccessful endoscopic dilatation before the reconstructive surgery. All patients underwent nephrostomy placement prior to the reconstructive procedure. Robotic uretero-ileal reanastomosis started with adhesiolysis, followed by the identification of the ureters and urinary diversion, facilitated by the use of intracavitary saline or ICG. When dissecting the ureters, a „no touch” technique was used, in order to minimize devascularization and ischemia. Localization of the ureteral stricture was critical. The excision of the entire ischemic segment was performed until signs indicative of adequate tissue trophism were found. At the same time, consideration was given to spare sufficient length of the ureteral stumps to allow for a tension-free anastomosis. Direct anastomosis using monofilament resorbable suture, with insertion of mono J or double J stent was performed with both ileal conduit and neobladder. Bricker technique was used in case of unilateral stricture. Results: The median operative time for robotic uretero-ileal reanastomosis was 152 min (IQR 120–180) and the median blood loss was 50 ml (IQR 40–70). No intraoperative complications occurred according to the ICARUS criteria. Median length of hospital stay was 4.5 days (IQR 3–6). Two Clavien-DIndo II (20 %) postoperative complications were registered (urinary tract infection and acute kidney injury). No patients required readmission or reoperation. The mean length of ureteral catheterization for reimplantation in IC was 20.7 days (± 4.29). For patients with NB, the mean ureteral and urethral catheterization times were 54.3 days (± 22.8) and 19.3 days (± 11.08), respectively. The ureteral stents were removed in all patients. At a median of 16 months follow-up (range 6–36 months), 2 patients (one IC and one NB, respectively) had persistent hydronephrosis. Conclusion: In patients requiring surgery for benign ureteral strictures following cystectomy, robotic surgery allows for safe and efficient ureteral reimplantation in urinary diversion.