Back to Search Start Over

Continuous Noninvasive Remote Automated Blood Pressure Monitoring With Novel Wearable Technology: A Preliminary Validation Study

Authors :
Michael H McGillion
Nazari Dvirnik
Stephen Yang
Emilie Belley-Côté
Andre Lamy
Richard Whitlock
Maura Marcucci
Flavia K Borges
Emmanuelle Duceppe
Carley Ouellette
Marissa Bird
Sandra L Carroll
David Conen
Jean-Eric Tarride
Prathiba Harsha
Ted Scott
Amber Good
Krysten Gregus
Karla Sanchez
Pamela Benoit
Julian Owen
Valerie Harvey
Elizabeth Peter
Jeremy Petch
Jessica Vincent
Michelle Graham
P J Devereaux
Source :
JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 10, Iss 2, p e24916 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
JMIR Publications, 2022.

Abstract

BackgroundWearable continuous monitoring biosensor technologies have the potential to transform postoperative care with early detection of impending clinical deterioration. ObjectiveOur aim was to validate the accuracy of Cloud DX Vitaliti continuous vital signs monitor (CVSM) continuous noninvasive blood pressure (cNIBP) measurements in postsurgical patients. A secondary aim was to examine user acceptance of the Vitaliti CVSM with respect to comfort, ease of application, sustainability of positioning, and aesthetics. MethodsIncluded participants were ≥18 years old and recovering from surgery in a cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). We targeted a maximum recruitment of 80 participants for verification and acceptance testing. We also oversampled to minimize the effect of unforeseen interruptions and other challenges to the study. Validation procedures were according to the International Standards Organization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 standards for wearable, cuffless blood pressure (BP) measuring devices. Baseline BP was determined from the gold-standard ICU arterial catheter. The Vitaliti CVSM was calibrated against the reference arterial catheter. In static (seated in bed) and supine positions, 3 cNIBP measurements, each 30 seconds, were taken for each patient with the Vitaliti CVSM and an invasive arterial catheter. At the conclusion of each test session, captured cNIBP measurements were extracted using MediCollector BEDSIDE data extraction software, and Vitaliti CVSM measurements were extracted to a secure laptop through a cable connection. The errors of these determinations were calculated. Participants were interviewed about device acceptability. ResultsThe validation analysis included data for 20 patients. The average times from calibration to first measurement in the static position and to first measurement in the supine position were 133.85 seconds (2 minutes 14 seconds) and 535.15 seconds (8 minutes 55 seconds), respectively. The overall mean errors of determination for the static position were –0.621 (SD 4.640) mm Hg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 0.457 (SD 1.675) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Errors of determination were slightly higher for the supine position, at 2.722 (SD 5.207) mm Hg for SBP and 2.650 (SD 3.221) mm Hg for DBP. The majority rated the Vitaliti CVSM as comfortable. This study was limited to evaluation of the device during a very short validation period after calibration (ie, that commenced within 2 minutes after calibration and lasted for a short duration of time). ConclusionsWe found that the Cloud DX’s Vitaliti CVSM demonstrated cNIBP measurement in compliance with ISO 81060-2:2018 standards in the context of evaluation that commenced within 2 minutes of device calibration; this device was also well-received by patients in a postsurgical ICU setting. Future studies will examine the accuracy of the Vitaliti CVSM in ambulatory contexts, with attention to assessment over a longer duration and the impact of excessive patient motion on data artifacts and signal quality. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03493867; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03493867

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22915222
Volume :
10
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2719b3bcf6e4fe69c44b606d8550835
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/24916