Comparison of validity, repeatability and reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between digital and conventional study models

MLA

Pasapula Sridhar, et al. “Comparison of Validity, Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between Digital and Conventional Study Models.” Australasian Orthodontic Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, Jan. 2016, pp. 184–92. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-126.

APA

Pasapula Sridhar, Sherriff Martyn, Breckon Jeremy, Bister Dirk, & Abela Stefan. (2016). Comparison of validity, repeatability and reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between digital and conventional study models. Australasian Orthodontic Journal, 32(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-126

Chicago

Pasapula Sridhar, Sherriff Martyn, Breckon Jeremy, Bister Dirk, and Abela Stefan. 2016. “Comparison of Validity, Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between Digital and Conventional Study Models.” Australasian Orthodontic Journal 32 (2): 184–92. doi:10.21307/aoj-2020-126.