Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence and incidence of cancer amongst adults with intellectual disability — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Authors :
Andrew Wormald
Martin McMahon
Valerie Smith
Louise Lynch
Jessica Eustace-Cook
Mary McCarron
Philip McCallion
Source :
HRB Open Research, Vol 6 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
F1000 Research Ltd, 2024.

Abstract

Background People with intellectual disabilities have poorer health and die earlier than their peers without identified disabilities. This difference represents a significant inequality. Until recently, it was considered that cancer was less common in this population, mainly because they did not live long enough to develop age-related cancers. However, recent evidence has identified that people with intellectual disabilities may be at an increased risk of developing cancer but more likely to present for medical treatment at a later stage when cancer has spread. Nonetheless, the evidence is lacking and there is a need to understand the prevalence and incidence of cancer and subtypes of cancer in adults with intellectual disabilities. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis will be undertaken to investigate the prevalence and incidence of cancer and subtypes of cancer in adults with an intellectual disability. The JBI Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence and the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to develop this protocol. Electronic databases will be searched using predefined search terms to identify relevant studies using the Condition Context Population (CoCoPop) framework. Eligible studies should be observational and have published baseline data that have estimated or presented data on the prevalence or incidence of cancer in adults with intellectual disabilities. To assess the methodological quality of studies included in this review a modified version of the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data will be used. Prevalence and incidence proportions will be analysed separately with individual study data being pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird proportion method and a random effects meta-analysis will be undertaken. Discussion This review will advance the epidemiological evidence to identify where targeted cancer care interventions are needed to help reduce the inequalities that this population experiences. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023423584

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25154826
Volume :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
HRB Open Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.28503c715ae34ecf8ce87c5e63d7acf4
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13740.2