Back to Search Start Over

Surgical options for submucosal tumors near the esophagogastric junction: does size or location matter?

Authors :
Yi-Chun Huang
Chun-Nan Yeh
Ming-Yang Chen
Shang-Yu Wang
Keng-Hao Liu
Chun-Yi Tsai
Ta-Sen Yeh
Source :
BMC Surgery, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMC, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Background Submucosal tumors (SMTs) of different etiologies exist from esophagus to rectum. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is one of the known difficult locations for tumor resection. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a well-established approach for gastrointestinal surgery, there is no consensus that MIS for resection of SMTs around EGJ is superior to laparotomy. We tried to clarify the factors that determine the surgeons’ choices between these two approaches. Methods From January 2002 to June 2016, 909 patients with SMTs underwent resection in our department. Among them, 119 patients (13%) had SMTs around EGJ were enrolled by retrospective review. The clinicopathological features and tumor-related parameters were reviewed and analyzed. Results The cohort was stratified into three groups according to the extent of gastrectomy and surgical approaches. The three groups are as following: major gastrectomy (n = 13), minor gastrectomy by laparotomy (n = 51), and minor gastrectomy with MIS (n = 55). The average tumor size was significantly larger in the major gastrectomy group than in the two minor gastrectomy groups; however, there was no difference between the two minor gastrectomy groups (5.33 cm, 4.07 cm, and 3.69 cm, respectively). The minor gastrectomy with MIS required least hospital stay and operation duration also. We re-stratify the two minor gastrectomy groups (n = 106) according to the orientation of SMTs around the EGJ into 4 zones. Most of SMTs located on the greater curvature side of the EGJ were resected with MIS (82% versus 18%), whereas SMTs in the other zones were resected more often by laparotomy (59% versus 41%). There was no surgical mortality within the cohort, while minor gastrectomy with MIS yielded least number of leakages among the three groups. Conclusions For SMTs around the EGJ, larger tumors (diameter of more than 5 cm) are more likely to be resected with major gastrectomy. To resect SMTs around the EGJ in a wedge-like (minor gastrectomy) fashion, tumors located other than the greater curvature side were more often resected by laparotomy. However, MIS yielded acceptable safety and surgical outcomes compared to conventional laparotomy for SMTs around the EGJ of the same size.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712482
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.28a83a4116394bfdac15d1d3ccd838ed
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00840-6