Back to Search Start Over

OC6 Phase II: Integration and verification of a new soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind design

Authors :
Roger Bergua
Amy Robertson
Jason Jonkman
Andy Platt
Ana Page
Jacob Qvist
Ervin Amet
Zhisong Cai
Huali Han
Alec Beardsell
Wei Shi
Josean Galván
Erin Bachynski‐Polić
Gill McKinnon
Violette Harnois
Paul Bonnet
Loup Suja‐Thauvin
Anders Melchior Hansen
Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso
Ander Aristondo
Tommaso Battistella
Raúl Guanche
Paul Schünemann
Thanh‐Dam Pham
Pau Trubat
Daniel Alarcón
Florence Haudin
Minh Quan Nguyen
Akhilesh Goveas
Source :
Wind Energy, Vol 25, Iss 5, Pp 793-810 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a summary of the work done within the OC6 Phase II project, which was focused on the implementation and verification of an advanced soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind system design and analysis. The soil–structure interaction model comes from the REDWIN project and uses an elastoplastic, macroelement model with kinematic hardening, which captures the stiffness and damping characteristics of offshore wind foundations more accurately than more traditional and simplified soil–structure interaction modeling approaches. Participants in the OC6 project integrated this macroelement capability to coupled aero‐hydro‐servo‐elastic offshore wind turbine modeling tools and verified the implementation by comparing simulation results across the modeling tools for an example monopile design. The simulation results were also compared to more traditional soil–structure interaction modeling approaches like apparent fixity, coupled springs, and distributed springs models. The macroelement approach resulted in smaller overall loading in the system due to both shifts in the system frequencies and increased energy dissipation. No validation work was performed, but the macroelement approach has shown increased accuracy within the REDWIN project, resulting in decreased uncertainty in the design. For the monopile design investigated here, that implies a less conservative and thus more cost‐effective offshore wind design.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10991824 and 10954244
Volume :
25
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Wind Energy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2ad64182ba7486b8ab351282be3ca8a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2698