Hemodynamic assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: comparison between invasive non-hyperemic pressure ratio and angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio

ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) for hemodynamic exploration of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, using the invasive cerebrovascular pressure ratio (CVPR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) as reference standards.Materials and methodsPatients with symptomatic unifocal intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis were included. The CVPR was defined as the ratio of the proximal and distal pressures. All patients underwent angioplasty under general anesthesia. The QFR was calculated based on digital subtraction angiography. Using the CVPR as a reference, we compared its correlation with the QFR across different degrees and locations of stenosis.ResultsThe CVPR and QFR were measured in 34 vessels of 32 patients. The QFR demonstrated a high correlation and excellent agreement(r = 0.8227, p 80%, the QFR showed a high correlation (r = 0.8812, p