Back to Search Start Over

Dietary intake of trans fatty acids and breast cancer risk in 9 European countries

Authors :
Michèle Matta
Inge Huybrechts
Carine Biessy
Corinne Casagrande
Sahar Yammine
Agnès Fournier
Karina Standahl Olsen
Marco Lukic
Inger Torhild Gram
Eva Ardanaz
Maria-José Sánchez
Laure Dossus
Renée T. Fortner
Bernard Srour
Franziska Jannasch
Matthias B. Schulze
Pilar Amiano
Antonio Agudo
Sandra Colorado-Yohar
J. Ramón Quirós
Rosario Tumino
Salvatore Panico
Giovanna Masala
Valeria Pala
Carlotta Sacerdote
Anne Tjønneland
Anja Olsen
Christina C. Dahm
Ann H. Rosendahl
Signe Borgquist
Maria Wennberg
Alicia K. Heath
Dagfinn Aune
Julie Schmidt
Elisabete Weiderpass
Veronique Chajes
Marc J. Gunter
Neil Murphy
Source :
BMC Medicine, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMC, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Background Trans fatty acids (TFAs) have been hypothesised to influence breast cancer risk. However, relatively few prospective studies have examined this relationship, and well-powered analyses according to hormone receptor-defined molecular subtypes, menopausal status, and body size have rarely been conducted. Methods In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), we investigated the associations between dietary intakes of TFAs (industrial trans fatty acids [ITFAs] and ruminant trans fatty acids [RTFAs]) and breast cancer risk among 318,607 women. Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for other breast cancer risk factors. Results After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 13,241 breast cancer cases occurred. In the multivariable-adjusted model, higher total ITFA intake was associated with elevated breast cancer risk (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23; P trend = 0.001). A similar positive association was found between intake of elaidic acid, the predominant ITFA, and breast cancer risk (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23; P trend = 0.001). Intake of total RTFAs was also associated with higher breast cancer risk (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.17; P trend = 0.015). For individual RTFAs, we found positive associations with breast cancer risk for dietary intakes of two strongly correlated fatty acids (Spearman correlation r = 0.77), conjugated linoleic acid (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.20; P trend = 0.001) and palmitelaidic acid (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16; P trend = 0.028). Similar associations were found for total ITFAs and RTFAs with breast cancer risk according to menopausal status, body mass index, and breast cancer subtypes. Conclusions These results support the hypothesis that higher dietary intakes of ITFAs, in particular elaidic acid, are associated with elevated breast cancer risk. Due to the high correlation between conjugated linoleic acid and palmitelaidic acid, we were unable to disentangle the positive associations found for these fatty acids with breast cancer risk. Further mechanistic studies are needed to identify biological pathways that may underlie these associations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17417015
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2d174a0c88004926b07f81229be2fcdc
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01952-3