Back to Search Start Over

A deep learning model for personalized intra-arterial therapy planning in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective studyResearch in context

Authors :
Xiaoqi Lin
Ran Wei
Ziming Xu
Shuiqing Zhuo
Jiaqi Dou
Haozhong Sun
Rui Li
Runyu Yang
Qian Lu
Chao An
Huijun Chen
Source :
EClinicalMedicine, Vol 75, Iss , Pp 102808- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Summary: Background: Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (uHCC) poses a substantial global health challenge, demanding innovative prognostic and therapeutic planning tools for improved patient management. The predominant treatment strategies include Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Methods: Between January 2014 and November 2021, a total of 1725 uHCC patients [mean age, 52.8 ± 11.5 years; 1529 males] received preoperative CECT scans and were eligible for TACE or HAIC. Patients were assigned to one of the four cohorts according to their treatment, four transformer models (SELECTION) were trained and validated on each cohort; AUC was used to determine the prognostic performance of the trained models. Patients were stratified into high and low-risk groups based on the survival scores computed by SELECTION. The proposed AI-based treatment decision model (ATOM) utilizes survival scores to further inform final therapeutic recommendation. Findings: In this study, the training and validation sets included 1448 patients, with an additional 277 patients allocated to the external validation sets. The SELECTION model outperformed both clinical models and the ResNet approach in terms of AUC. Specifically, SELECTION-TACE and SELECTION-HAIC achieved AUCs of 0.761 (95% CI, 0.693–0.820) and 0.805 (95% CI, 0.707–0.881) respectively, in predicting ORR in their external validation cohorts. In predicting OS, SELECTION-TC and SELECTION-HC demonstrated AUCs of 0.736 (95% CI, 0.608–0.841) and 0.748 (95% CI, 0.599–0.865) respectively, in their external validation sets. SELECTION-derived survival scores effectively stratified patients into high and low-risk groups, showing significant differences in survival probabilities (P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25895370
Volume :
75
Issue :
102808-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EClinicalMedicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2ed756fe2fde4ecf9a7003ceea5b0d8a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102808