Back to Search Start Over

Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients

Authors :
Thomas Langer
Matteo Brioni
Amedeo Guzzardella
Eleonora Carlesso
Luca Cabrini
Gianpaolo Castelli
Francesca Dalla Corte
Edoardo De Robertis
Martina Favarato
Andrea Forastieri
Clarissa Forlini
Massimo Girardis
Domenico Luca Grieco
Lucia Mirabella
Valentina Noseda
Paola Previtali
Alessandro Protti
Roberto Rona
Francesca Tardini
Tommaso Tonetti
Fabio Zannoni
Massimo Antonelli
Giuseppe Foti
Marco Ranieri
Antonio Pesenti
Roberto Fumagalli
Giacomo Grasselli
PRONA-COVID Group
Source :
Critical Care, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMC, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Background Limited data are available on the use of prone position in intubated, invasively ventilated patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Aim of this study is to investigate the use and effect of prone position in this population during the first 2020 pandemic wave. Methods Retrospective, multicentre, national cohort study conducted between February 24 and June 14, 2020, in 24 Italian Intensive Care Units (ICU) on adult patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. Clinical data were collected on the day of ICU admission. Information regarding the use of prone position was collected daily. Follow-up for patient outcomes was performed on July 15, 2020. The respiratory effects of the first prone position were studied in a subset of 78 patients. Patients were classified as Oxygen Responders if the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased ≥ 20 mmHg during prone position and as Carbon Dioxide Responders if the ventilatory ratio was reduced during prone position. Results Of 1057 included patients, mild, moderate and severe ARDS was present in 15, 50 and 35% of patients, respectively, and had a resulting mortality of 25, 33 and 41%. Prone position was applied in 61% of the patients. Patients placed prone had a more severe disease and died significantly more (45% vs. 33%, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.301c1ade11b7459bb66a924cc61c3926
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2