Back to Search Start Over

Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

Authors :
Hao-Wei Jiang
Cheng-Dong Chen
Bi-Shui Zhan
Yong-Li Wang
Pan Tang
Xue-Sheng Jiang
Source :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMC, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Background Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) is a rapidly growing surgical method that uses arthroscopic system for treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), while percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has been standardized as a representative minimally invasive spine surgical technique for LDH. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between UBE and PELD for treatment of patients with LDH. Methods The subjects consisted of 54 patients who underwent UBE (24 cases) and PELD (30 cases) who were followed up for at least 6 months. All patients had lumber disc herniation for 1 level. Outcomes of the patients were assessed with operation time, incision length, hospital stay, total blood loss (TBL), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), complications, total hospitalization costs, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. Results The VAS scores and ODI decreased significantly in two groups after operation. Preoperative and 1 day, 1 month, 6 months after operation VAS and ODI scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with PELD group, UBE group was associated with higher TBL, higher IBL, higher HBL, longer operation time, longer hospital stay, longer incision length, and more total hospitalization costs. However, a dural tear occurred in one patient of the UBE group. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the two groups. Conclusions Application of UBE for treatment of lumbar disc herniation yielded similar clinical outcomes to PELD, including pain control and patient satisfaction. However, UBE was associated with various disadvantages relative to PELD, including increased total, intraoperative and hidden blood loss, longer operation times, longer hospital stays, and more total hospitalization costs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1749799X and 83652647
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.31c05d88476c49ee9d9ff836526476cb
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5