Back to Search Start Over

Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Authors :
Eirini Karyotaki
Pim Cuijpers
Sonya B Norman
Davide Papola
Marit Sijbrandij
Soraya Seedat
Miranda Olff
Sudie E Back
Richard Gray
Rolf J Kleber
Francisco Lotufo Neto
Jonathan Bisson
Damion Grasso
Grant J Devilly
Ulrich Schnyder
Marylene Cloitre
Nigel Hunt
Anke B Witteveen
Simonne Wright
Joy M Schmitz
Dana Bichescu-Burian
Liuva Capezzani
Thomas Elbert
Marcelo Mello
Julian D Ford
Pedro Gamito
Moira Haller
Julia König
Claire Kullack
Jonathan Laugharne
Rachel Liebman
Christopher William Lee
Jeannette Lely
John C. Markowitz
Candice Monson
Mirjam J Nijdam
Tahereh Mina Orang
Luca Ostacoli
Nenad Paunovic
Eva Petkova
Patricia Resick
Rita Rosner
Maggie Schauer
Brian N. Smith
Anka A Vujanovic
Yinyin Zang
Érica Panzani Duran
Source :
BMJ Mental Health, Vol 27, Iss 1 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2024.

Abstract

Background Available empirical evidence on participant-level factors associated with dropout from psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is both limited and inconclusive. More comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to study dropout from cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes.Objective Using an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) design, we examined participant-level predictors of study dropout from CBT-TF interventions for PTSD.Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials comparing CBT-TF with waitlist control, treatment-as-usual or another therapy. Academic databases were screened from conception until 11 January 2021. Eligible interventions were required to be individual and in-person delivered. Participants were considered dropouts if they did not complete the post-treatment assessment.Findings The systematic literature search identified 81 eligible studies (n=3330). Data were pooled from 25 available CBT-TF studies comprising 823 participants. Overall, 221 (27%) of the 823 dropped out. Of 581 civilians, 133 (23%) dropped out, as did 75 (42%) of 178 military personnel/veterans. Bivariate and multivariate analyses indicated that military personnel/veterans (RR 2.37) had a significantly greater risk of dropout than civilians. Furthermore, the chance of dropping out significantly decreased with advancing age (continuous; RR 0.98).Conclusions These findings underscore the risk of premature termination from CBT-TF among younger adults and military veterans/personnel.Clinical implication Understanding predictors can inform the development of retention strategies tailored to at-risk subgroups, enhance engagement, improve adherence and yield better treatment outcomes.

Subjects

Subjects :
Psychiatry
RC435-571

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
27559734
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Mental Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.34b9e4702d244f47971481ba11e1b8e9
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301159