Back to Search Start Over

Tumor mutational burden assessment and standardized bioinformatics approach using custom NGS panels in clinical routine

Authors :
Célia Dupain
Tom Gutman
Elodie Girard
Choumouss Kamoun
Grégoire Marret
Zahra Castel-Ajgal
Marie-Paule Sablin
Cindy Neuzillet
Edith Borcoman
Ségolène Hescot
Céline Callens
Olfa Trabelsi-Grati
Samia Melaabi
Roseline Vibert
Samantha Antonio
Coralie Franck
Michèle Galut
Isabelle Guillou
Maral Halladjian
Yves Allory
Joanna Cyrta
Julien Romejon
Eleonore Frouin
Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Jennifer Wong
Christophe Le Tourneau
Ivan Bièche
Nicolas Servant
Maud Kamal
Julien Masliah-Planchon
Source :
BMC Biology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was reported to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1, received FDA-approval for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic tumors with high TMB as determined by the FoundationOne®CDx test. It remains to be determined how TMB can also be calculated using other tests. Results FFPE/frozen tumor samples from various origins were sequenced in the frame of the Institut Curie (IC) Molecular Tumor Board using an in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. A TMB calculation method was developed at IC (IC algorithm) and compared to the FoundationOne® (FO) algorithm. Using IC algorithm, an optimal 10% variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off was established for TMB evaluation on FFPE samples, compared to 5% on frozen samples. The median TMB score for MSS/POLE WT tumors was 8.8 mut/Mb versus 45 mut/Mb for MSI/POLE-mutated tumors. When focusing on MSS/POLE WT tumor samples, the highest median TMB scores were observed in lymphoma, lung, endometrial, and cervical cancers. After biological manual curation of these cases, 21% of them could be reclassified as MSI/POLE tumors and considered as “true TMB high.” Higher TMB values were obtained using FO algorithm on FFPE samples compared to IC algorithm (40 mut/Mb [10–3927] versus 8.2 mut/Mb [2.5–897], p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17417007
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.38a817e5035043189c5b339051b10be7
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01839-8