Associations between type of bariatric surgery and obstructive sleep apnoea, employment outcomes, and body image satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction: Bariatric surgery has been shown to provide significant patient benefits in terms of weight loss and mitigation of obesity linked co-morbidities, as well as providing improvements in occupational productivity and patient quality of life. However, the choice of which bariatric surgery procedure provides the most patient benefit in each of these cases is still in question. In this study we provide a systematic review, with the objective of evaluating associations between different bariatric surgery procedures and mitigation of obesity linked co-morbidities, improvement in occupational productivity, and patient quality of life, concentrating on three areas: obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), employment prospects and body image. Methods: The CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched for eligible studies. Summary risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using random-effects models. Thirty-three studies were included in this review, including 29 cohort studies and 4 randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Results: Pooled analysis of the observational studies showed significantly lower OSA remission in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) across both short-term (1-2 years) and longer-term (3+ years) follow-up periods, (RR=0.91, 95% CI = 0.84–0.99, p=0.02 and RR=0.88, 95% CI = 0.65–0.99, p=0.03 respectively). In contrast, a metanalysis of the RCT studies found no difference in OSA remission between SG and RYGB (RR=1.01, 95% CI = 0.81–1.25, p=0.93). An analysis of four studies showed significantly higher OSA remission for SG versus Adjustable Gastric Band (RR=1.83, 95% CI = 1.57–2.14, p