Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Tramadol for Treatment of Shivering Post Spinal Anaesthesia
- Source :
- Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 73, Iss 6 (2023)
- Publication Year :
- 2023
- Publisher :
- Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2023.
-
Abstract
- Objective: To compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine with Tramadol for shivering post-spinal anaesthesia. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul to Dec 2020. Methodology: A total of 158 patients who underwent gynaecological, orthopaedic and general surgical procedures under spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine 12-15 mg were included in the study. Out of these 158 patients, 64% (102 patients) developed shivering after spinal anaesthesia. These 102 patients were divided into two equal groups, i.e., Group-D (n=51), who received 0.5 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine and Group-T (n=51), who received 0.5 mg/kg tramadol. The response in the next 15 mins was evaluated objectively as “effective” or “non-effective” by the treating Anesthesiologist. Results: Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol were effective in treating shivering following spinal anaesthesia. Our study showed that Dexmedetomidine was more effective than Tramadol in treating shivering, with an effectiveness of 88.2 % shivering relief in Group-D and an effectiveness of 51 % shivering relief in Group-T. The effectiveness was significant in both groups, with statistical significance in Group-D compared to Group-T (p
- Subjects :
- Dexmedetomidine
Efficacy
Shivering
Spinal
Tramadol
Medicine
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00309648 and 24118842
- Volume :
- 73
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.3ae79114a745ebb1ce72d05dd6935f
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.6345