Back to Search Start Over

Real-world experience with obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Authors :
Daphne D’Amato
Antonio De Vincentis
Federica Malinverno
Mauro Viganò
Domenico Alvaro
Maurizio Pompili
Antonino Picciotto
Valeria Pace Palitti
Maurizio Russello
Silvia Storato
Marie Graciella Pigozzi
Vincenza Calvaruso
Elisabetta De Gasperi
Ana Lleo
Antonino Castellaneta
Adriano Pellicelli
Nora Cazzagon
Annarosa Floreani
Luigi Muratori
Stefano Fagiuoli
Grazia Anna Niro
Valentina Feletti
Raffaele Cozzolongo
Natalia Terreni
Marco Marzioni
Rinaldo Pellicano
Pietro Pozzoni
Leonardo Baiocchi
Luchino Chessa
Floriano Rosina
Gaetano Bertino
Maria Vinci
Anna Morgando
Ester Vanni
Gaetano Scifo
Rodolfo Sacco
Maria D’Antò
Valentina Bellia
Roberto Boldizzoni
Silvia Casella
Barbara Omazzi
Guido Poggi
Laura Cristoferi
Alessio Gerussi
Vincenzo Ronca
Rosanna Venere
Francesca Ponziani
Maria Cannavò
Alessandro Mussetto
Rosanna Fontana
Francesco Losito
Evelise Frazzetto
Marco Distefano
Francesca Colapietro
Sara Labanca
Giulia Marconi
Giuseppe Grassi
Giovanni Galati
Sarah Elizabeth O’Donnell
Clara Mancuso
Giacomo Mulinacci
Andrea Palermo
Ernesto Claar
Antonio Izzi
Antonio Picardi
Pietro Invernizzi
Marco Carbone
Umberto Vespasiani-Gentilucci
Source :
JHEP Reports, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 100248- (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Background & aims: Obeticholic acid (OCA) is the second-line treatment approved for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and an inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of OCA under real-world conditions. Methods: Patients were recruited into the Italian PBC Registry, a multicentre, observational cohort study that monitors patients with PBC at national level. The primary endpoint was the biochemical response according to Poise criteria; the secondary endpoint was the biochemical response according to normal range criteria, defined as normal levels of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at 12 months. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: We analysed 191 patients until at least 12 months of follow-up. Median age was 57 years, 94% female, 61 (32%) had cirrhosis, 28 (15%) had histologically proven overlap with autoimmune hepatitis (PBC-AIH). At 12 months, significant median reductions of ALP (-32.3%), ALT (-31.4%), and bilirubin (-11.2%) were observed. Response rates were 42.9% according to Poise criteria, and 11% by normal range criteria. Patients with cirrhosis had lower response than patients without cirrhosis (29.5% vs. 49.2%, p = 0.01), owing to a higher rate of OCA discontinuation (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.004), although with similar ALP reduction (29.4% vs. 34%, p = 0.53). Overlap PBC-AIH had a similar response to pure PBC (46.4% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.68), with higher ALT reduction at 6 months (-38% vs. -29%, p = 0.04). Thirty-three patients (17%) prematurely discontinued OCA because of adverse events, of whom 11 experienced serious adverse events. Treatment-induced pruritus was the leading cause of OCA discontinuation (67%). Conclusions: Effectiveness and safety of OCA under real-world conditions mirror those in the Poise trial. Patients with cirrhosis had lower tolerability. Overlap PBC-AIH showed higher ALT reduction at 6 months compared with patients with pure PBC. Lay summary: Obeticholic acid (OCA) was shown to be effective in more than one-third of patients not responding to ursodeoxycholic acid in a real-world context in Italy. Patients with cirrhosis had more side effects with OCA, and this led to suspension of the drug in one-third of patients. OCA was also effective in patients who had overlap between autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25895559
Volume :
3
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
JHEP Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3bd5090ee148768daea8f1e94b4ae4
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100248